Skip to main content

Security report for srtjb.com

Other · N/a

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in Email security, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

58/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website srtjb.com is a newly registered domain with minimal online presence and content. The site currently serves only a minimal HTTP 200 OK response with no meaningful content, metadata, or user interface elements. This lack of content and transparency severely limits the ability to assess the business operations, target audience, or services offered. The domain registration is consistent with a new business established in 2023, but no further business details are available from the site or WHOIS data. From a technical perspective, the website lacks modern web technologies, metadata, and security headers. DNSSEC is not enabled, and no SSL/TLS configuration details are provided, though the domain status is 'ok'. The absence of privacy policies, cookie consent mechanisms, and contact information indicates poor compliance with privacy regulations such as GDPR. No forms, scripts, or analytics tools are detected, suggesting minimal digital maturity. Security posture is weak due to the lack of security headers and DNSSEC, though no active blocking or WAF mechanisms are detected. The site does not expose any sensitive data or vulnerabilities based on the limited content. However, the absence of standard security and privacy practices poses risks for user trust and regulatory compliance. Overall, the website presents a high risk due to its minimal content, lack of transparency, and poor security and privacy practices. Strategic recommendations include enhancing website content and metadata, implementing security best practices, enabling DNSSEC, and establishing clear privacy and incident response policies to improve trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
40/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching srtjb.com

This scan found 28 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
15
Email security
60
DNS health
60
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
40
Average
58

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Due to the absence of business-related content on the website, no detailed business intelligence can be derived. The domain is registered to Danesco Trading Ltd., but no further information about the company's market positioning, business model, or services is available. The lack of contact details, social media presence, or partner links suggests the business is either in a very early stage or not actively maintained online. No revenue streams, customer segments, or growth indicators can be identified from the current data.

Security posture

The security posture of srtjb.com is minimal and immature. The domain does not have DNSSEC enabled, and no security headers are present in the HTTP response. There is no evidence of HTTPS enforcement or SSL/TLS configuration details, which is a critical security gap. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure policies are published. The absence of privacy and cookie policies further indicates non-compliance with GDPR and related regulations. While no active vulnerabilities or malware are detected, the lack of basic security controls and transparency increases the risk of exploitation and undermines user trust.

Recommendations

  1. Enable HTTPS with a valid SSL/TLS certificate and enforce secure connections site-wide.
  2. Implement DNSSEC to protect against DNS spoofing and improve domain security.
  3. Add comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with clear GDPR compliance statements.
  4. Publish contact information and establish incident response and vulnerability disclosure procedures.
  5. Incorporate standard security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Content quality
poor
Branding
inconsistent

Technology

Performance
moderate
Mobile
poor
Accessibility
poor
SEO
poor

Security

Observed score
30/100

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
poor
User experience
poor
Content relevance
poor
Navigation
poor
Professionalism
poor
Trustworthiness
low

Key observations

  1. Website content is extremely minimal, only returning a '200 OK' text with no meaningful content.
  2. No metadata, no forms, no scripts, no external links, no contact information found in the HTML content.
  3. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies detected.
  4. No security headers or advanced security configurations detected.
  5. Domain is newly registered with a valid registrar and standard status.
  6. No evidence of WAF or blocking mechanisms.
  7. Overall website quality and trustworthiness are very low due to lack of content and transparency.
Technical notes

Notes

The website currently serves a minimal HTML page with no metadata, scripts, or stylesheets. No CMS or frameworks are detected. The domain uses name servers ns.anycastns1.org and ns.anycastns2.org, but hosting provider details are not available. The site lacks mobile optimization, accessibility features, and SEO best practices. Performance is likely moderate due to minimal content but the user experience is poor due to lack of meaningful content or navigation. The technical infrastructure appears basic and requires modernization to support a functional and secure website.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with srtjb.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review srtjb.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.