Skip to main content

Security report for srd-luc.hr

Športsko ribolovno društvo LUC Novalja · Other · Croatia

High risk. 10 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

45/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Športsko ribolovno društvo LUC Novalja is a well-established Croatian sports fishing society founded in 1973. The organization focuses on promoting fishing sports through competitions and community events, serving a local and regional audience of fishing enthusiasts. Their website reflects a community-oriented non-profit model with clear contact information and active event updates. Technically, the site uses a modern tech stack including AMP for mobile optimization, Bootstrap for responsive design, and JavaScript libraries for enhanced user experience. However, the CMS is custom or unknown, and hosting details are not explicit. Security posture is moderate; HTTPS is used, and cookie consent is implemented, but security headers and vulnerability disclosures are lacking. Privacy compliance is basic with a cookie banner and a linked cookie policy page but no explicit privacy policy or terms of service pages. Overall, the website is professional and trustworthy but could improve in security and compliance areas.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching srd-luc.hr

This scan found 27 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
15
Email security
85
DNS health
75
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
10
Average
45

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The organization holds a solid position in the regional sports fishing community with over 150 members and active participation in competitions. Their business model is non-profit and community-focused, relying on events and member engagement. Partnerships with local government and tourism entities are evident through linked domains. The website serves as an information hub and communication channel rather than a commercial platform. Growth indicators include regular event updates and social media integration. The partnership ecosystem includes local authorities and design service providers, supporting the organization's digital presence.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic security maturity level. HTTPS is enforced, and a cookie consent mechanism is present, indicating awareness of privacy regulations. However, the absence of security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS), and X-Frame-Options reduces protection against common web attacks. No vulnerability disclosure or incident response information is provided, limiting transparency and preparedness. The use of third-party libraries like jQuery and Bootstrap requires regular updates to mitigate vulnerabilities. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a small non-profit but requires enhancements to meet higher compliance standards.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including CSP, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options.
  2. Publish a detailed privacy policy and terms of service pages to improve compliance and transparency.
  3. Establish a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting.
  4. Regularly update third-party libraries and monitor for security patches.
  5. Add incident response contact information and consider appointing a Data Protection Officer.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Športsko ribolovno društvo LUC Novalja
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Športsko ribolovno društvo LUC Novalja
Description
Sportsko ribolovno društvo LUC Novalja, founded on April 1, 1973, is a fishing sports society organizing competitions and events related to fishing and underwater fishing. It has over 150 members from Novalja and other Croatian cities.
Key services
Organizing fishing competitions, Community engagement in fishing sports, Information dissemination about events and regulations
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
HTML5, CSS3, JavaScript, jQuery, Bootstrap 4.2.1, AMP (Accelerated Mobile Pages), Unite Gallery, Fancybox, Vegas Slider
Frameworks
Bootstrap, AMP
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
50/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS usage implied by base href (https://www.srd-luc.hr)
  • Cookie consent banner implemented

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook SDK
Marketing tools
Facebook social plugins
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Cookie consent banner is implemented and visible.
  3. No explicit privacy policy page found but a cookie policy link is present.
  4. No terms of service or security policy pages detected.
  5. Contact information is clearly provided including email, phone, and physical address.
  6. Social media presence on Facebook is integrated.
  7. Technical stack uses modern libraries and AMP for mobile optimization.
  8. No advanced security headers or vulnerability disclosures found.
  9. Content is relevant and appropriate for a sports fishing society.
  10. No suspicious or malicious content detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a combination of AMP for fast mobile rendering, Bootstrap 4.2.1 for responsive layout, and jQuery for DOM manipulation. Image galleries are powered by Unite Gallery and Fancybox, while Vegas Slider provides animated backgrounds. The site loads external resources from reputable CDNs, enhancing performance. However, no CMS is detected, suggesting a custom-built solution which may require dedicated maintenance. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization. Accessibility is basic, with room for improvement in semantic markup and ARIA roles. SEO is basic with meta tags present but no structured data or Open Graph tags detected. Overall, the technical implementation is solid but could benefit from modernization and enhanced accessibility.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with srd-luc.hr. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review srd-luc.hr.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.