Skip to main content

Security report for spribe.co

Spribe OÜ · Technology · Estonia

Low risk. 3 critical or high findings in Security headers and GDPR outside view.

Security score

81/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Spribe OÜ is a technology company specializing in innovative casino games for the iGaming industry. Founded in 2015 and based in Estonia, Spribe offers a portfolio of next-generation, provably fair games such as Aviator, Turbo Games, Poker, Skill Games, and Slots. The company positions itself as a pioneer in smart casino gaming, targeting online casino operators and players with engaging and transparent gaming experiences. The website reflects a professional and consistent brand image with clear navigation and good content quality. Technically, the website is built using modern Angular framework (version 15), hosted on Amazon Web Services, and integrates Google Analytics and Tag Manager for marketing and analytics purposes. The site is mobile optimized and performs moderately well, though accessibility features are basic. Security is enforced via HTTPS with a clientTransferProhibited domain status, but lacks DNSSEC and visible security headers, which are recommended for enhanced protection. From a security perspective, Spribe demonstrates good practices such as provably fair cryptographic technology and licensing by the UK Gambling Commission, which adds trustworthiness. However, explicit security policies, incident response contacts, and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms are not publicly available, representing areas for improvement. Privacy and cookie policies are present with consent mechanisms, supporting GDPR compliance. Overall, Spribe's website and domain registration data indicate a legitimate and credible business with a strong market position in the iGaming technology sector. Strategic recommendations include enhancing DNS security, publishing detailed security policies, and improving security headers to strengthen the security posture and trust further.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
68/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching spribe.co

This scan found 14 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
100
Security headers
35
Email security
100
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
68
Average
81

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Spribe operates as a B2B technology provider in the iGaming sector, focusing on next-generation casino games that leverage provably fair cryptography to ensure transparency and trust. Their product suite targets online casino operators seeking innovative and engaging game offerings for adult players. The company benefits from a strong licensing framework, including the UK Gambling Commission, which supports regulatory compliance and market access. Spribe's partnerships and social media presence indicate active engagement with the gaming community and industry stakeholders. The business model centers on software development and licensing, with revenue likely derived from game integration and usage fees. Growth indicators include recent marketing partnerships and continuous product innovation. The company maintains a medium size with a focused technology-driven approach.

Security posture

Spribe demonstrates a mature security posture with HTTPS enforced and domain transfer protections in place. The use of provably fair technology is a significant trust and security feature in the gambling industry. However, the absence of DNSSEC and security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS), and X-Frame-Options reduces the overall security hardening. No public incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is available, which could delay response to security incidents. Privacy compliance is supported by clear privacy and cookie policies with consent mechanisms. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected. Overall, the security posture is good but could be improved with additional security controls and transparency.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to protect against DNS spoofing and improve DNS security.
  2. Implement and configure security headers including CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Publish a dedicated security policy page including incident response contacts and vulnerability disclosure guidelines.
  4. Add a security.txt file to facilitate responsible vulnerability reporting.
  5. Enhance accessibility features to improve compliance and user experience for all users.

Contact details published on the site

Legal name
Spribe OÜ
Registration number
57302 (UK Gambling Commission account number)
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Spribe OÜ
Description
Spribe offers next generation, engaging games for the iGaming industry, including smart casino games such as Aviator, Turbo Games, Poker, Skill Games, and Slots.
Key services
Provably Fair games, Engagement tools with promo and social mechanics, Various casino game types (Aviator, Poker, Skill Games, Slots)
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Angular 15, Google Analytics, AWS Hosting, Google Fonts
Frameworks
Angular
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • ClientTransferProhibited domain status
  • Provably Fair cryptography technology

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and navigation.
  2. Strong focus on innovative casino games with provably fair technology.
  3. Good use of modern web technologies and hosting on AWS.
  4. Privacy and cookie policies are present with consent mechanisms.
  5. No explicit contact emails or phone numbers publicly listed; contact form is primary channel.
  6. Security headers not detected in HTML content; recommend adding for enhanced security.
  7. No terms of service page found.
  8. Social media presence on LinkedIn and Facebook.
  9. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt found.
  10. WHOIS data supports legitimacy and business consistency.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on Angular 15, a modern and robust front-end framework, ensuring a dynamic and responsive user experience. Hosting on AWS provides scalable and reliable infrastructure. Google Analytics and Tag Manager are used for analytics and marketing tracking. The site uses Google Fonts for typography and includes SVG and PNG assets for branding and UI elements. Performance is moderate with no critical errors detected. The site is mobile optimized with responsive design. However, the lack of DNSSEC and security headers indicates some technical debt in security hardening. SEO is supported by proper meta tags and structured navigation. Overall, the technical implementation is solid with room for security improvements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with spribe.co. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review spribe.co.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.