Skip to main content

Security report for sportstg.com

GameDay · Technology · N/a

Low risk. 2 critical or high findings in Email security and SSL/TLS.

Security score

86/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

GameDay is a market-leading technology provider specializing in sports management, event ticketing, CRM, and competition management solutions. The company targets a broad audience including national governing bodies, grassroots clubs, charities, and foundations, offering a comprehensive suite of tools to streamline sports and event operations. Their business model is primarily B2B SaaS, delivering scalable and integrated digital solutions to the sports sector. The website reflects a mature digital presence with professional design, clear navigation, and strong branding consistency. Technically, the site is built on WordPress using the Avada theme, enhanced with Yoast SEO, Google Tag Manager, and Trustpilot integrations. Cookie consent is managed via CookieYes, ensuring GDPR compliance. The site demonstrates good mobile optimization and accessibility features, although performance is moderate, likely due to rich media content and multiple third-party scripts. From a security perspective, the website enforces HTTPS and employs standard security headers, though additional headers like CSP and HSTS could enhance protection. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected. Privacy compliance is robust with clear cookie consent mechanisms and a comprehensive privacy policy. However, incident response contact details and vulnerability disclosure information are not explicitly provided. Overall, GameDay presents a low-risk profile with strong business credibility and a secure, compliant web presence. Strategic recommendations include enhancing security headers, publishing explicit incident response contacts, and continuous monitoring of third-party scripts to maintain security posture.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

2 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching sportstg.com

This scan found 14 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
82
Security headers
90
Email security
75
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
83
Average
86

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

GameDay holds a strong position in the sports technology market, offering an extensive product range that covers membership management, event ticketing, competitions, payments, and business intelligence. Their competitive advantage lies in an integrated platform tailored for sports organizations of all sizes, from grassroots to national bodies. Revenue streams likely include subscription fees and service contracts. The company fosters partnerships, evidenced by a dedicated community platform. Growth indicators include active marketing, professional content, and integration with trusted third-party services like Trustpilot. The business ecosystem appears well-structured with clear service offerings and customer engagement channels.

Security posture

The website exhibits a mature security posture with HTTPS enforced and cookie consent mechanisms aligned with GDPR. Security headers are present but could be expanded to include CSP, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options for enhanced protection. No vulnerable libraries or exposed credentials were found. The use of session cookies and third-party scripts is managed appropriately. However, the absence of explicit incident response contacts and vulnerability disclosure policies represents a compliance gap. Overall, the security culture appears proactive but could benefit from formalized incident response and disclosure practices.

Recommendations

  1. Implement additional security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, Strict-Transport-Security, and X-Frame-Options to strengthen defense against common web attacks.
  2. Publish clear incident response contact information (e.g., security@ or abuse@ email addresses) to improve transparency and readiness.
  3. Establish and publicize a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting of security issues.
  4. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and plugins to mitigate risks from external dependencies.
  5. Enhance website performance optimization to improve user experience, especially on mobile devices.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
GameDay
Description
Global leader in sports management, event & ticketing software, CRM, online registration, competition management, and commercial solutions.
Key services
Membership & Registrations, Events & Ticketing, Competitions & Tournaments, Programs, Courses & Accreditations, Online Payments, Business Intelligence, Match Official Management, Live Scoring, Mobile App
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Yoast SEO, jQuery, Google Tag Manager, Trustpilot Widgets, CookieYes Consent Management
Frameworks
Avada Theme
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent banner with customization
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of session cookies for PHPSESSID

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Drift
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
doubleclick.net
Tracking pixels
Trustpilot
Marketing tools
Trustpilot
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and well-structured
  2. Comprehensive cookie consent mechanism implemented
  3. Use of modern web technologies and SEO best practices
  4. No signs of phishing or malware
  5. Clear business focus on sports and event management technology
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a WordPress CMS platform using the Avada theme, supported by modern web technologies including jQuery and asynchronous loading of scripts like Google Tag Manager and Trustpilot widgets. SEO is well-implemented with Yoast SEO plugin and structured data in JSON-LD format. Cookie consent is managed via CookieYes, ensuring compliance with privacy regulations. Hosting appears to be via WP Engine or a similar managed WordPress host. Performance is moderate, with room for optimization in script loading and image sizes. Accessibility and mobile responsiveness are good, supporting a wide range of users. Technical risks are minimal but include dependency on multiple third-party scripts which require ongoing monitoring.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 73/100Medium26 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with sportstg.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review sportstg.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.