Bundesministerium für Wohnen, Kunst, Kultur, Medien und Sport (BMWKMS) · Government · Austria
Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Email security, DNS health and 2 other checks.
The website www.bmwkms.gv.at represents the official online presence of the Austrian Federal Ministry for Housing, Arts, Culture, Media, and Sports (BMWKMS). It serves as a comprehensive information and service portal for citizens, cultural professionals, sports organizations, and media stakeholders in Austria. The ministry provides extensive resources including policy updates, funding opportunities, publications, and contact information. The site is well-branded, professionally designed, and clearly targeted at a broad public audience with interests in government services related to culture, sports, media, and housing. Technically, the website employs modern web standards including HTML5, CSS3, and JavaScript, with Bootstrap framework elements indicating responsive design. It uses eTracker for analytics, integrated with a cookie consent mechanism ensuring GDPR compliance. The site is mobile-optimized and accessible, with clear navigation and structured content. Hosting details are not explicitly disclosed, but HTTPS is enforced with a strong SSL configuration. From a security perspective, the site demonstrates good practices such as HTTPS usage and cookie consent. However, explicit security headers like Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options are not visible in the provided data, and no published security policy or incident response contacts were found. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected. The domain WHOIS data aligns with the Austrian government entity, confirming legitimacy and trustworthiness. Overall, the website is a high-quality, trustworthy government portal with strong privacy and compliance posture. Strategic recommendations include enhancing security headers, publishing a security policy, and adding vulnerability disclosure information to further strengthen security and transparency.
Scanned
NIS2 Art. 21(2)
This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.
GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.
5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.
SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.
Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing
What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately
SPF helps prevent email spoofing
What to do: Add SPF record: "v=spf1 include:_spf.yourmailprovider.com ~all"
DNS sends visitors and email to the right servers. Misconfigured records can cause outages or let someone redirect your traffic.
Unable to resolve domain A records
What to do: Verify domain is properly configured and not expired
These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.
GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies
What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit
TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.
Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1
What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions
Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com
This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.
€25per month
Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.
Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.
€39.90one-time
Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.
Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.
The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.
Counted in this score
Not counted
Findings that cap the score at 49
Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.
Partial scans
When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.
Risk levels
Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.
Leaked records that mention sportministerium.at, from OffSeq Breach.
1 subdomain affected
See the 10 newest leaked credentials
A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for sportministerium.at.
Select it in the checkout above.
Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.
Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.
Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.
Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.
Retrieved 2026-10-25
Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.
Reviews of this site
Share your experience with sportministerium.at. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.
Community rating
No published reviews yet. Be the first to review sportministerium.at.