Skip to main content

Security report for sportingclubofsydney.com.au

Other · N/a

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

66/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The Sporting Club of Sydney website appears to be built on the Wix platform, utilizing standard Wix scripts and integrations such as Google Tag Manager and Facebook Pixel for analytics and marketing. However, the website content is incomplete or blocked, with no accessible privacy policy, cookie policy, terms of service, or contact information. The WHOIS data for the domain is malformed and lacks critical registration details, which raises concerns about transparency and legitimacy. The technical infrastructure is basic, relying on Wix hosting and standard third-party tracking services. Security posture is weak due to lack of visible HTTPS enforcement, security headers, and incident response information. Overall, the site presents a low trust profile with significant gaps in compliance and security best practices.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching sportingclubofsydney.com.au

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
35
Email security
85
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
66

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Due to the lack of accessible content and business information, detailed business intelligence is limited. The domain is likely associated with a sports club based in Sydney, Australia, but no explicit company details, market positioning, or service descriptions are available. The use of Wix suggests a small to medium-sized entity with a focus on local community engagement. The absence of contact and legal information limits the ability to assess revenue streams, partnerships, or growth indicators.

Security posture

The security posture of the website is currently poor. There is no evidence of HTTPS enforcement or security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options. The WHOIS data is incomplete, which may indicate privacy protection or data unavailability but reduces trust. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is present. Tracking scripts are present but without clear privacy compliance mechanisms. The site lacks transparency and essential security best practices, exposing it to potential risks.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and enforce HTTPS with a valid SSL certificate.
  2. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with GDPR compliance details.
  3. Add clear contact information including email, phone, and physical address.
  4. Improve WHOIS transparency or provide justification for privacy protection.
  5. Add security headers and conduct a security audit to identify vulnerabilities.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Generic detected. WHOIS query returned malformed request message; HTML content truncated and incomplete; no privacy, cookie, or contact info found; likely content blocked or minimal. These observations may be incomplete. For a fuller analysis, contact guard@offseq.com.

Business

Technology

Stack
Wix, Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, Google Ads GPT
Platforms
Wix.com

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (via Google Tag Manager)
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Ad networks
Google DoubleClick
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel
Marketing tools
Facebook Pixel
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Trustworthiness
low

Key observations

  1. Website content is incomplete or blocked
  2. No privacy or cookie policies detected
  3. No contact information or forms found
  4. Uses Wix platform with standard Wix scripts
  5. Includes Google Tag Manager and Facebook Pixel for tracking
  6. No security headers or SSL info available
  7. WHOIS data is malformed and incomplete
  8. No business or legal information found
  9. Advertising and tracking present but transparency is low
  10. Content safety is rated safe with no adult content
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on the Wix platform, leveraging Wix's hosting and content management capabilities. It uses Google Tag Manager and Facebook Pixel for analytics and marketing. The site lacks visible performance optimization data and accessibility features. The HTML content is truncated and incomplete, indicating possible blocking or minimal content delivery. There is no evidence of modern frameworks beyond Wix's standard stack. The technical implementation is basic and requires improvements in security and compliance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with sportingclubofsydney.com.au. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review sportingclubofsydney.com.au.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.