Skip to main content

Security report for splitvisions.se

Split visions · Technology · Sweden

High risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 2 other checks.

Security score

43/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Split visions is a specialized provider of professional video communication and innovative conference room solutions, established in 2009 and based in Sweden. The company focuses on optimizing meeting environments for platforms such as Microsoft Teams and Zoom, offering tailored and intelligent solutions to enhance remote collaboration. Their market position is that of a reliable and independent premium partner in the video communication sector. Technically, the website is built on the Wix platform using modern technologies including React, Wix Pro Gallery, and Wix Forms, with good mobile optimization and accessibility features. Security is well-managed with HTTPS enforcement, secure cookie handling, and security scripts, although some standard security headers could be improved. Privacy compliance is evident with clear privacy and cookie policies and consent mechanisms. Overall, the website demonstrates a professional and trustworthy digital presence with moderate to good performance and technical implementation.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
23/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • Critical

      No HTTPS encryption

      GDPR requires appropriate security measures for personal data

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate for HTTPS

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS Encryption

      Website does not use HTTPS encryption, making all data transmission vulnerable to interception

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate and redirect all HTTP traffic to HTTPS

  4. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching splitvisions.se

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
35
Email security
40
DNS health
60
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
23
Average
43

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Split visions targets businesses and organizations requiring advanced video communication and meeting room solutions. Their business model centers on providing service and support for digital communication technologies, including consultation and tailored solutions. The company maintains a strong social media presence and offers multiple contact channels, enhancing customer engagement. Their market position is supported by a decade-plus history and consistent branding. The company operates primarily in the technology sector within Sweden, with additional offices in Norway. No parent or subsidiary companies were identified. The website content and structure indicate a small-sized enterprise with a focus on quality and innovation in their niche.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS, ensuring encrypted communications, and includes scripts to enhance security by overriding global objects and hardening fetch and XHR requests. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. However, explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options are not visibly configured, which could be improved to mitigate risks like clickjacking and cross-site scripting. The use of Sentry for error monitoring indicates proactive security incident detection. Overall, the security posture is good but could benefit from additional standard HTTP security headers and regular dependency audits.

Recommendations

  1. Implement explicit Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options headers to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Regularly audit and update third-party libraries and scripts to prevent vulnerabilities.
  3. Enhance privacy compliance by providing more detailed GDPR-related disclosures and data retention policies.
  4. Improve SEO by adding structured data (JSON-LD) for business and contact information.
  5. Consider adding a dedicated security policy and incident response contact information to build user trust.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Split visions
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Split visions
Description
Split visions is a partner for professional video communication and innovative conference room solutions, focusing on optimizing meeting rooms for platforms like Microsoft Teams and Zoom. They provide tailored, intelligent meeting environments to enhance remote collaboration.
Key services
Professional video communication, Meeting room optimization, Support and consultation, Innovative conference room solutions
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Wix.com Website Builder, JavaScript, React, Wix Pro Gallery, Wix Forms, Wix Chat, Wix Stores, Wix Members Area, Wix Payments, Wix Video
Frameworks
React
Platforms
Wix
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of secure cookies with access token handling
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Security scripts to override globals and harden fetch/XHR

Analytics and tracking

Services
Wix BI, Sentry
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Sentry
Marketing tools
Wix Chat, Wix Forms
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is built on Wix platform with modern technologies
  2. Content is professional and relevant to video communication services
  3. Contact information is clearly presented with multiple channels
  4. Privacy and cookie policies are present and compliant
  5. No critical security issues or WAF blocking detected
  6. Use of third-party services like Sentry for error monitoring
  7. Multiple languages supported with clear language selection
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on the Wix platform, leveraging React and various Wix-specific components such as Wix Pro Gallery, Wix Forms, and Wix Chat. It uses modern JavaScript bundling and lazy loading techniques for performance optimization. The site is responsive and includes accessibility features like skip-to-content links and ARIA labels. Performance is moderate, with multiple videos and images optimized using AVIF format. The technical infrastructure is robust for a small business, but there is room for improvement in SEO and security header implementation. The use of third-party services is extensive but well-integrated.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with splitvisions.se. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review splitvisions.se.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.