Skip to main content

Security report for spl-xdemat.fr

SPL-XDEMAT · Government · France

Partial score · DNS & email only

56/100

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

SPL-XDEMAT is a French public local company established in 2012 by multiple departmental governments to provide digital dematerialization services tailored for local authorities. The company offers a suite of applications and services including administrative document management, electronic signatures, public procurement platforms, and citizen communication tools. The website reflects a mature regional service provider with a strong focus on government clients and compliance with French regulations. Technically, the site uses standard web technologies such as jQuery and JavaScript, with a responsive and accessible design optimized for mobile devices. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced and no visible vulnerabilities, though some security headers are missing and no explicit incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is provided. Privacy and cookie policies are present and appear comprehensive, supporting GDPR compliance. The absence of WHOIS data limits domain legitimacy verification but the professional presentation and official departmental partnerships support trustworthiness.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
40/ 100 · High
Checks completed
6of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      Unable to retrieve SSL certificate

      Could not establish secure connection to retrieve certificate information

      What to do: Check if the server is accessible and SSL/TLS is properly configured

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching spl-xdemat.fr

This scan found 14 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Email security
75
DNS health
65
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
40
Average
56

Not counted

  • Security headers: did not complete in this scan.
  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention spl-xdemat.fr, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
227
Employees
0
Customers
227
Third parties
0
Weak passwords
26%

6 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for spl-xdemat.fr.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company occupies a niche in the French public sector digital services market, serving eight departmental governments and over 3,400 local entities. Its business model is service-oriented, focusing on providing compliant digital tools for administrative dematerialization. The presence of official departmental logos and links to partner sites indicates a strong regional partnership ecosystem. The company leverages mobile applications to extend service accessibility. Growth indicators include recent additions of local entities as clients. The website content and structure emphasize trust and professionalism, targeting government organizations and local authorities. Revenue streams likely derive from service contracts with public entities. No direct advertising or commercial tracking is evident, aligning with the public service nature of the business.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a good security baseline with HTTPS enforced and no exposed sensitive data. However, the lack of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and Strict-Transport-Security reduces defense-in-depth. No visible vulnerabilities or outdated libraries were detected in the HTML content. The login process is offloaded to a dedicated secure domain, which is a positive security practice. The absence of a published security policy or incident response contacts limits transparency and preparedness communication. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file was found, which could improve security culture and external reporting. Overall, the security posture is good but could be enhanced by implementing recommended headers, explicit cookie consent, and incident response information.

Recommendations

  1. Implement security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Add an explicit cookie consent banner/mechanism to comply fully with GDPR and ePrivacy regulations.
  3. Publish a dedicated security policy page and provide incident response contact details to improve transparency and readiness.
  4. Consider creating and hosting a security.txt file to facilitate vulnerability reporting by external researchers.
  5. Regularly audit and update third-party libraries and scripts to mitigate risks from known vulnerabilities.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
SPL-XDEMAT
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
SPL-XDEMAT
Description
SPL-XDEMAT is a public local company created in 2012 by several French departments to provide digital dematerialization services to local governments. It offers management, maintenance, development, and deployment of tools compliant with regulations for its shareholders and other local entities.
Key services
Digital dematerialization, Document management and signature, Public procurement platform, Accounting flux transmission, Citizen communication applications
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, JavaScript, CSS, HTML5
Performance
moderate
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Secure login redirect to separate login domain

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge.
  2. Content is professionally presented and targeted at French local government entities.
  3. Multiple official departmental logos and links reinforce trust.
  4. No forms detected on the landing page; login redirects to a separate domain.
  5. No social media links found on the main page.
  6. No explicit security.txt or incident response contacts found.
  7. Privacy and cookie policies are present and linked in footer.
  8. No advertising or tracking scripts detected.
  9. Mobile optimization is excellent with responsive design and viewport meta tags.
  10. No Open Graph or JSON-LD structured data found in the HTML head.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a classic web technology stack with jQuery and JavaScript libraries loaded from local paths. The HTML is well-structured with responsive design meta tags and CSS for mobile optimization. Performance appears moderate with no heavy external dependencies or advertising scripts. No CMS or hosting provider information is directly detectable. The site uses asynchronous and deferred script loading to improve performance. Accessibility is supported by semantic HTML and clear navigation. SEO is supported by meta description and structured navigation links. There is no structured data (JSON-LD or Open Graph) detected, which could be added to improve search engine visibility. The technical implementation is solid but could benefit from modern enhancements such as progressive web app features or structured data markup.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with spl-xdemat.fr. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review spl-xdemat.fr.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.