Skip to main content

Security report for spinpalace.com

Baytree Interactive Ltd · E-commerce · Guernsey

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

67/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Spin Palace operates as a premium online casino platform offering a broad selection of casino games, including slots, live casino, blackjack, roulette, and baccarat. The company emphasizes a safe and responsible gaming environment, supported by licensing from the Kahnawake Gaming Commission and certifications such as eCOGRA. The website provides a professional and engaging user experience with rich multimedia content, clear navigation, and mobile optimization. Technically, the site uses modern JavaScript libraries, analytics tools, and implements SSL encryption to secure user data. However, the absence of WHOIS registration data for the domain raises questions about domain registration transparency, although the business information and licensing claims support legitimacy. No direct contact emails or phone numbers are provided, which may impact user trust and support accessibility. Overall, the site demonstrates a strong security posture and privacy compliance with room for improvement in transparency and incident response disclosures.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching spinpalace.com

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
57
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
83
Average
67

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Spin Palace targets online casino players globally, focusing on markets where online gambling is regulated. The business model revolves around real money gaming, promotions, and loyalty rewards to retain customers. Partnerships with leading software providers like Pragmatic Play and Evolution enhance the gaming portfolio. The affiliate program with Buffalo Partners indicates a structured marketing ecosystem. The company is registered in Guernsey, a known jurisdiction for online gambling entities, which supports regulatory compliance. The lack of visible direct contact information and WHOIS data may be a strategic privacy measure but could affect customer trust. The site’s content quality and certifications position it as a reputable player in the online gambling industry.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and uses SSL encryption to protect user data. Security best practices include account verification, certified RNGs for fair play, deposit limits, and responsible gaming resources. The presence of eCOGRA certification and licensing by the Kahnawake Gaming Commission further strengthens trust. However, explicit security headers like Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options are not clearly identified in the provided data, suggesting potential areas for enhancement. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the analysis. The absence of a published security policy or incident response contact limits transparency in security governance. Overall, the security posture is strong but could benefit from more explicit security documentation and headers.

Recommendations

  1. Publish explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance browser security.
  2. Provide a dedicated security policy page and clear incident response contact information to improve transparency and trust.
  3. Consider implementing and publishing a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
  4. Add verified company contact emails and phone numbers to improve customer support accessibility and trust.
  5. Clarify domain registration details or ensure WHOIS data is available to enhance legitimacy and reduce suspicion.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Baytree Interactive Ltd
Registration number
69691
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Baytree Interactive Ltd
Description
Spin Palace is a premium online casino offering a wide range of casino games, promotions, and partnerships with leading software providers. It provides a safe, reputable, and responsible gaming experience with a focus on real money online casino services.
Key services
Online casino games, Live casino, Promotions and bonuses, Loyalty club, Secure payment methods
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, jQuery 3.6.0, Google Tag Manager, Site24x7 RUM, Swiper.js, Vanilla LazyLoad, ePrivacy plugin
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • SSL encryption for data protection
  • Account verification
  • Fair play RNG certification
  • Deposit limits
  • Responsible gaming support

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (via GTM), Site24x7 Real User Monitoring, vtrk analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Site24x7 RUM, vtrk analytics
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and multimedia.
  2. Strong focus on responsible gaming and security best practices.
  3. Comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with consent mechanisms.
  4. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found on the main site.
  5. WHOIS data unavailable, which reduces trust score but site shows strong trust signals.
  6. Use of modern web technologies and analytics tools.
  7. Multiple trusted certifications and licenses displayed.
  8. Affiliate program clearly linked.
  9. No signs of WAF or blocking mechanisms.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern technology stack including jQuery 3.6.0, Google Tag Manager, Site24x7 Real User Monitoring, and Swiper.js for UI components. Lazy loading and responsive design techniques are employed for performance and mobile optimization. The site loads multimedia content such as videos and images efficiently. SEO is supported by proper meta tags, Open Graph, and JSON-LD structured data. No CMS was explicitly detected, suggesting a custom or proprietary platform. Hosting provider details are not available. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and accessibility features. The technical implementation is solid with opportunities to improve security headers and incident response mechanisms.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with spinpalace.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review spinpalace.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.