Skip to main content

Security report for spectrumcontractors.com

Spectrum Contractors · Other · N/a

Medium risk. 3 critical or high findings in SSL/TLS, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

71/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Spectrum Contractors is a business entity with a website currently under construction. The site provides minimal content, primarily a placeholder message indicating temporary unavailability. The company appears to be registered since 2005, with domain registration through GoDaddy.com, LLC. The website uses GoDaddy Website Builder and includes a contact form protected by Google reCAPTCHA, along with a cookie consent banner, indicating some basic compliance with privacy and security norms. However, no privacy policy, terms of service, or detailed business information is present, limiting the ability to fully assess the company's market position or services. The technical infrastructure is moderate, leveraging modern web technologies and hosting by a reputable provider.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
68/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching spectrumcontractors.com

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
57
Security headers
45
Email security
70
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
68
Average
71

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Due to the lack of detailed content and business descriptions, the market positioning and competitive advantages of Spectrum Contractors cannot be determined. The absence of contact emails, phone numbers, or physical addresses restricts insights into customer engagement or support capabilities. The website's use of GoDaddy's platform suggests a small to medium-sized business model, possibly in early stages of digital presence development. No partnerships or subsidiaries are identified. The current state suggests a focus on establishing an online presence before expanding business operations or marketing efforts.

Security posture

The website benefits from HTTPS encryption and employs Google reCAPTCHA on its contact form, which are positive security measures. However, the absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options indicates room for improvement in hardening the site against common web vulnerabilities. No incident response or security policies are disclosed, and no vulnerability disclosure or security.txt files are present. DNSSEC is not enabled, which could enhance domain security. Overall, the security posture is basic but functional, suitable for a site with limited content and interaction.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service to improve compliance and user trust.
  2. Add security headers to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  3. Enable DNSSEC to strengthen domain name system security.
  4. Develop and disclose incident response and vulnerability disclosure policies to demonstrate security maturity.
  5. Expand business information and contact details to improve credibility and customer engagement.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Spectrum Contractors
Description
No detailed business description available; website is temporarily under construction.
Content quality
poor
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
GoDaddy Website Builder, Google reCAPTCHA, JavaScript, CSS, Intersection Observer API
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Google reCAPTCHA for contact form
  • Cookie consent banner

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Ad networks
GoDaddy Ads
Tracking pixels
GoDaddy tracking pixel
Marketing tools
Google reCAPTCHA
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
poor
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
poor
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is currently under construction with minimal content.
  2. No privacy policy or terms of service pages found.
  3. Contact form present with Google reCAPTCHA protection.
  4. Cookie consent banner implemented.
  5. No explicit business or security policies disclosed.
  6. Website uses GoDaddy Website Builder and hosting.
  7. No phone numbers, emails, or physical addresses found.
  8. No social media links detected.
  9. No security headers detected in provided data.
  10. SSL is enabled and valid.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using GoDaddy Website Builder, hosted by GoDaddy.com, LLC, and uses modern web standards including responsive design and Google reCAPTCHA for form security. Performance is moderate with no evident critical technical issues. The site lacks advanced SEO and accessibility features but includes basic meta tags and mobile optimization. The absence of security headers and DNSSEC indicates technical debt in security hardening. The site is currently minimal in content, which impacts overall technical maturity and user experience.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with spectrumcontractors.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review spectrumcontractors.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.