Skip to main content

Security report for spearline.com

Cyara, Inc. · Technology · United States

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, SSL/TLS and 1 other check.

Security score

61/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Cyara, Inc. is a medium-sized technology company founded in 2007, specializing in AI-led customer experience (CX) transformation platforms. Their website presents a comprehensive suite of services focused on contact center technology assurance, including testing and monitoring of IVRs, chatbots, and live voice interactions. The company holds a strong market position supported by numerous industry awards and partnerships with leading technology providers such as Twilio, AWS, and Salesforce. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with modern frameworks and integrates multiple analytics and marketing tools, reflecting a mature digital infrastructure. Security-wise, the site employs HTTPS, cookie consent mechanisms, and best practices in script loading, though it lacks a dedicated security policy or incident response contact details. Overall, Cyara demonstrates a high level of professionalism, trustworthiness, and compliance with privacy regulations, making it a credible and reliable business entity in the CX technology sector.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
63/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS encryption

      GDPR requires appropriate security measures for personal data

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate for HTTPS

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS Encryption

      Website does not use HTTPS encryption, making all data transmission vulnerable to interception

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate and redirect all HTTP traffic to HTTPS

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching spearline.com

This scan found 16 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
60
Email security
60
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
63
Average
61

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Cyara operates a B2B SaaS business model targeting enterprises seeking to optimize and assure their customer experience journeys. Their platform spans the entire development lifecycle of contact center technologies, offering AI-powered testing, monitoring, and analytics solutions. The company’s competitive advantages include extensive global coverage, a no-code user interface, and a broad partner ecosystem with major cloud and contact center technology providers. Revenue streams likely derive from platform subscriptions, consulting, training, and support services. The presence of high-profile customers and multiple awards indicates strong market acceptance and innovation leadership. Strategic observations suggest Cyara is well-positioned to capitalize on the growing demand for AI-driven CX assurance in a digital-first economy.

Security posture

The website exhibits a good security posture with HTTPS enforced and multiple security headers likely in place. The presence of a cookie consent banner and privacy policy indicates compliance with GDPR and related regulations. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. However, the absence of a published security policy, incident response contacts, or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms represents a compliance gap and an area for improvement. The extensive use of third-party analytics and marketing scripts necessitates ongoing vigilance to mitigate supply chain risks. Overall, the security maturity is solid but could be enhanced by formalizing security governance and transparency.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a dedicated security policy page detailing security practices and commitments.
  2. Provide clear incident response contact channels such as security@ or abuse@ email addresses.
  3. Implement and publicize a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file.
  4. Conduct regular audits of third-party scripts and dependencies to identify and mitigate vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance accessibility features to meet or exceed compliance standards and improve user experience.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Cyara, Inc.
Description
Cyara enables companies to elevate their customer experience strategy with their AI-led CX transformation platform. Cyara offers the only solution spanning the entire development lifecycle for contact center technology, including testing and monitoring of IVRs, chatbots, and live voice interactions with a no-code interface.
Key services
AI-Powered CX Assurance Platform, Call Explorer, Call Routing & Agent Desktop Testing, Cloud Contact Center Monitoring, Conversational AI Testing, Integrations, Omnichannel Testing, Voice Quality Testing, Consulting, Training
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, jQuery, Kadence Blocks, HubSpot Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, LinkedIn Insight Tag, ZoomInfo Pixel, Bing UET, Bizible, Marketo, Microsoft Clarity, Gutenslider, Mega Menu Pro
Frameworks
Genesis Framework (WordPress theme)
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
excellent

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of HTTPS
  • Cookie consent banner with opt-in/out
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of security and analytics scripts asynchronously

Analytics and tracking

Services
HubSpot Analytics, Google Analytics (via GTM), Microsoft Clarity, ZoomInfo, Bizible, Marketo
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Facebook Ads, Bing Ads
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, LinkedIn Insight Tag, ZoomInfo Pixel, Bing UET, HubSpot Analytics, Marketo, Bizible, Microsoft Clarity
Marketing tools
HubSpot, Marketo, Bizible, Accelevents
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and well-structured
  2. Comprehensive AI-led CX assurance platform offerings
  3. Strong presence of industry awards and customer logos
  4. Extensive use of third-party analytics and marketing tools
  5. Clear privacy and cookie policies with consent mechanisms
  6. No signs of blocking or WAF challenges
  7. No exposed sensitive data or obvious vulnerabilities
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress using the Genesis Framework and Kadence Blocks, indicating a modern and flexible CMS infrastructure. It integrates a variety of marketing and analytics tools including HubSpot, Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, LinkedIn Insight Tag, and Microsoft Clarity, reflecting a sophisticated digital marketing strategy. Performance optimizations such as lazy loading, script minification, and CDN usage contribute to fast loading times. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design and accessibility considerations. Technical risks are minimal but include dependency on multiple third-party scripts which require continuous monitoring. Opportunities exist to further modernize by adopting security best practices and enhancing compliance transparency.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with spearline.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review spearline.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.