Skip to main content

Security report for spacemanic.com

Spacemanic · Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 2 other checks.

Security score

64/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Spacemanic is a specialized satellite mission integrator focusing on nanosatellite and CubeSat platforms, components, and services. The company offers a range of solutions including satellite design, development, testing, launch campaigns, and ground station services, targeting space research organizations and aerospace industry clients. Their market position is that of a niche provider with flight heritage and certifications such as NASA certification and ITAR-free status. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with Elementor and uses modern technologies including Google reCAPTCHA Enterprise and HubSpot analytics, indicating a mature digital infrastructure. Security posture is generally good with HTTPS enforced and domain transfer protections, though DNSSEC is not enabled and security headers are not evident. Privacy compliance is weak due to absence of privacy and cookie policies. Overall, the website is professional, trustworthy, and content-rich, but could improve transparency and compliance aspects.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
68/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching spacemanic.com

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
15
Email security
85
DNS health
55
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
68
Average
64

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Spacemanic operates in the technology and transportation sectors, providing B2B nanosatellite mission integration services. Their competitive advantage lies in their flight heritage, certifications, and comprehensive service offerings from design to launch. The business model focuses on delivering tailored satellite solutions and mission support. The company maintains an active social media presence and uses marketing tools like HubSpot to engage customers. Growth indicators include recent satellite missions and product launches. The partnership ecosystem includes social media platforms and marketing service providers. Strategic observations suggest opportunities to enhance compliance and security transparency to strengthen market trust.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate to good security maturity level with HTTPS enabled and domain transfer lock in place. Use of Google reCAPTCHA Enterprise helps mitigate automated abuse. However, the lack of DNSSEC and missing security headers represent gaps that could be exploited. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The absence of published security policies and incident response contacts limits transparency and preparedness perception. Compliance with GDPR and other data protection regulations is unclear due to missing privacy and cookie policies. Overall, the security posture is adequate but could be improved with enhanced DNS security, security headers, and published policies.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to improve DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Implement and publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with clear consent mechanisms.
  3. Add security headers such as Content Security Policy, X-Frame-Options, and HSTS to harden the website.
  4. Publish a security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and trust.
  5. Consider adding a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Spacemanic
Description
Spacemanic is a satellite mission integrator specializing in nanosatellite solutions, platforms, components, and services. They provide CubeSat subsystems, nanosatellite platforms, and complex mission solutions, including design, development, testing, launch campaigns, and ground station services.
Key services
Satellite design, Research and development, Testing and qualification, Launch campaign management, Ground station services
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 6.8.3, Elementor 3.32.5, jQuery 3.7.1, Google reCAPTCHA Enterprise, HubSpot Analytics and Scripts, Cloudflare DNS
Frameworks
Elementor
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • ClientTransferProhibited domain status
  • Use of Google reCAPTCHA Enterprise
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
HubSpot Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
HubSpot Analytics
Marketing tools
HubSpot
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed with clear focus on nanosatellite and CubeSat solutions.
  2. No explicit privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on main site.
  3. Social media presence is active on major platforms.
  4. Use of HubSpot analytics and marketing tools indicates marketing maturity.
  5. No visible contact emails or phone numbers on main page; contact likely via contact page not included in HTML snippet.
  6. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure policy found.
  7. Domain is registered with a reputable registrar and has a stable registration status.
  8. No WAF or blocking mechanisms detected; site content fully accessible.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern WordPress CMS with Elementor page builder, leveraging jQuery and Google reCAPTCHA Enterprise for enhanced user interaction and security. HubSpot analytics and marketing scripts are integrated for data-driven marketing. The site is hosted behind Cloudflare DNS, though the hosting provider is not explicitly identified. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and basic accessibility features. SEO is supported by proper meta tags and structured navigation. Technical risks include missing DNSSEC and security headers, which should be addressed to reduce attack surface. The site shows no signs of technical debt or outdated libraries, indicating good maintenance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 58/100Medium33 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with spacemanic.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review spacemanic.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.