Skip to main content

Security report for sp-trk.com

Spider AF · Technology · N/a

Low risk. 3 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, SSL/TLS and 1 other check.

Security score

82/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Spider AF is a technology company specializing in click fraud protection software designed to safeguard advertisers' budgets from invalid traffic and maximize ROI. The company positions itself as a leading provider in the click fraud prevention market, offering SaaS solutions with a free trial to attract digital marketers and advertisers. The website is professionally designed, consistent in branding, and leverages modern marketing and analytics technologies to optimize user engagement and conversion tracking. Technically, the site is hosted on Amazon AWS infrastructure, built using Webflow CMS, and integrates multiple third-party analytics and marketing tools such as Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, LinkedIn Insight Tag, and Visual Website Optimizer. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced and domain status protections, though DNSSEC is not enabled and security headers are not explicitly observed. Privacy compliance is basic, with a cookie consent banner present but no visible privacy policy or terms of service. Contact information is not directly available on the site. Overall, the website demonstrates a mature digital presence suitable for a small technology SaaS business, with room for improvement in privacy transparency and security best practices.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of sp-trk.com. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
73/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

  3. DNS health

    DNS sends visitors and email to the right servers. Misconfigured records can cause outages or let someone redirect your traffic.

    • High

      Unregistered MX Record

      MX record points to unregistered domain: ms64056487.msv1.invalid

      What to do: Remove or fix MX record pointing to unregistered domain

      • RFC 5321 §5.1
      • NIS2 21(2)(i)
      • IR 2024/2690 12.4: Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 12.4: Asset inventory
      • NIST CM-8: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-8: System Component Inventory

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching sp-trk.com

This scan found 15 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
77
Security headers
75
Email security
93
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
73
Average
82

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention sp-trk.com, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for sp-trk.com right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Spider AF operates in the digital advertising technology sector, focusing on click fraud detection and prevention. Its business model is SaaS-based, targeting advertisers and marketers who seek to optimize ad spend efficiency. The company was founded in 2017, consistent with the domain registration date, and maintains a small company size profile. The website emphasizes trust through user ratings (4.8 stars on Capterra) and offers a free trial to encourage adoption. The marketing ecosystem includes integrations with major ad platforms and analytics services, indicating a strategic approach to customer acquisition and retention. No parent or subsidiary companies are identified, and no direct contact details are provided, which may limit direct customer engagement. The company’s market position is that of a specialized provider in click fraud protection, competing in a niche but critical segment of digital advertising.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS with a valid SSL certificate, ensuring encrypted communications. Domain registration includes clientDeleteProhibited, clientTransferProhibited, and clientUpdateProhibited statuses, which protect against unauthorized domain changes. However, DNSSEC is not enabled, which could expose DNS queries to spoofing attacks. No explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options were detected, representing an area for enhancement. The site uses reputable third-party services for analytics and marketing, but no direct security or incident response policies are published. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were identified in the analysis. The security posture is good but could be improved by implementing DNSSEC, security headers, and publishing security policies and incident response contacts.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to enhance DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service to improve compliance and user trust.
  3. Add explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  4. Provide clear contact information including security incident response channels (e.g., security@ or abuse@ emails).
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and tracking tools to minimize privacy risks and ensure compliance.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Spider AF
Description
Protect your ad budget from invalid traffic with Spider AF's cutting-edge click fraud prevention software. Maximize ROI and boost conversion rates today!
Key services
Click fraud detection, Click fraud prevention, Ad budget protection, ROI maximization
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics (gtag.js), Facebook Pixel, LinkedIn Insight Tag, Intercom Chat Widget, Visual Website Optimizer (VWO), Jetboost, CookieYes Consent Banner, jQuery, WebFont Loader
Frameworks
Webflow (implied by data-wf-domain attribute)
Platforms
AWS (Amazon Registrar, AWS DNS servers)
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Domain status includes clientDeleteProhibited, clientTransferProhibited, clientUpdateProhibited

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Visual Website Optimizer, PostHog
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Ads, Facebook Ads, LinkedIn Ads
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, LinkedIn Insight Tag
Marketing tools
Intercom, Visual Website Optimizer, Jetboost
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is accessible with full content and no blocking detected
  2. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service found on main page or metadata
  3. Cookie consent banner is implemented via CookieYes
  4. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found in content or metadata
  5. Strong use of modern marketing and analytics tools
  6. Domain registration and DNS configuration are standard and secure except DNSSEC is not enabled
  7. Website focuses on click fraud protection SaaS targeting advertisers
  8. Good branding consistency and professional presentation
  9. No suspicious or malicious content detected
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on the Webflow platform and hosted on Amazon AWS infrastructure, leveraging a modern tech stack including jQuery, Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, LinkedIn Insight Tag, Visual Website Optimizer, and Intercom for chat support. Performance is moderate with asynchronous loading of scripts and use of CDN-hosted assets. Mobile optimization is good, with responsive design and font loading optimizations. SEO is supported by proper meta tags, Open Graph, and Twitter card metadata. Accessibility features are basic but present. The site uses multiple marketing and analytics tools, indicating a mature digital marketing strategy. Technical risks include lack of DNSSEC and missing security headers, which should be addressed to reduce attack surface and improve security posture.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 77/100Low23 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with sp-trk.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review sp-trk.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.