Skip to main content

Security report for sp-gn.com

Spider Labs, Inc. · Technology · United States

Low risk. 2 critical or high findings in SSL/TLS and DNS health.

Security score

84/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Spider AF, operated by Spider Labs, Inc., is a mature technology company founded in 2017 specializing in advanced click fraud detection and prevention solutions. The company offers a SaaS platform trusted by over 800 global entities, providing comprehensive protection for digital advertising campaigns across multiple platforms including Google, Microsoft, Twitter, and Meta. Their services include PPC fraud protection, affiliate fraud protection, and fake lead protection, supported by AI-driven analytics and real-time blocking capabilities. The website demonstrates a high level of digital maturity with modern technologies, strong branding, and extensive use of analytics and marketing tools. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced and domain protections in place, though explicit security policies and incident response contacts are not published. Overall, Spider AF presents a professional, trustworthy, and technically sound online presence with good privacy compliance and user experience.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

2 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

  2. DNS health

    DNS sends visitors and email to the right servers. Misconfigured records can cause outages or let someone redirect your traffic.

    • High

      Unregistered MX Record

      MX record points to unregistered domain: ms64056487.msv1.invalid

      What to do: Remove or fix MX record pointing to unregistered domain

      • RFC 5321 §5.1
      • NIS2 21(2)(i)
      • IR 2024/2690 12.4: Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 12.4: Asset inventory
      • NIST CM-8: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-8: System Component Inventory

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching sp-gn.com

This scan found 14 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
74
Security headers
75
Email security
98
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
83
Average
84

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention sp-gn.com, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for sp-gn.com right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Spider AF occupies a competitive niche in the digital marketing security sector, leveraging AI and real-time analytics to differentiate itself. The business model is subscription-based SaaS with free trials and demos to attract customers. Their target market includes advertisers and enterprises seeking to optimize ad spend and reduce fraud losses. The company benefits from strong customer trust signals such as high ratings on Capterra and G2, certifications, and awards. The partnership ecosystem includes integrations with major ad platforms and marketing tools. Growth indicators include a broad client base and continuous content updates via blogs and whitepapers. Strategic observations suggest opportunities to enhance transparency around security policies and incident response to further strengthen market position.

Security posture

Spider AF exhibits a mature security posture with HTTPS enforced and domain registration protections that prevent unauthorized changes. The website uses cookie consent mechanisms compliant with GDPR and employs advanced tracking and bot detection scripts. However, explicit security policies and incident response contacts are absent, which could be a gap in transparency and readiness. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The use of multiple third-party analytics and marketing scripts introduces some risk, but no known vulnerable libraries were identified. Overall, the security culture appears proactive but could benefit from publishing dedicated security and incident response documentation.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a dedicated security policy page detailing security practices and controls.
  2. Add explicit incident response contact information and consider a security.txt file for vulnerability disclosures.
  3. Implement and declare security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  4. Regularly audit third-party scripts and dependencies to mitigate supply chain risks.
  5. Enhance transparency around data retention policies and user privacy controls.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Spider Labs, Inc.
Description
Spider AF provides advanced click fraud detection and prevention software to protect digital advertising budgets from invalid traffic and fraudulent clicks.
Key services
PPC Fraud Protection, Affiliate Fraud Protection, Fake Lead Protection, Click Fraud Detection and Blocking
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, PostHog Analytics, Intercom Chat Widget, CookieYes Consent Management, Visual Website Optimizer (VWO), Jetboost
Frameworks
Webflow CMS
Platforms
AWS (Registrar and DNS)
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of clientDeleteProhibited, clientTransferProhibited, clientUpdateProhibited domain statuses
  • Cookie consent banner with customization options
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of advanced tracking and bot detection scripts

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, PostHog, Visual Website Optimizer (VWO), Microsoft Clarity
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Ads, Microsoft Ads, Twitter Ads, Meta (Facebook) Ads
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, PostHog
Marketing tools
HubSpot (implied by hs scripts), Visual Website Optimizer (VWO), Intercom
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges
  2. Strong focus on click fraud detection and prevention
  3. Multiple trust signals including customer testimonials and third-party ratings
  4. Comprehensive cookie consent and privacy mechanisms implemented
  5. Use of modern web technologies and analytics tools
  6. No exposed sensitive data or security misconfigurations detected
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on the Webflow CMS platform, leveraging modern JavaScript libraries including jQuery and various analytics and marketing tools such as Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, PostHog, and Visual Website Optimizer. Hosting and domain registration are managed via Amazon Registrar, Inc., indicating reliable infrastructure. Performance is optimized with asynchronous script loading and responsive design ensuring excellent mobile optimization. The site uses cookie consent management via CookieYes, supporting GDPR compliance. Technical risks are minimal with no visible outdated or vulnerable libraries. Opportunities exist to improve security header implementation and formalize security documentation to reduce technical debt and enhance resilience.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with sp-gn.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review sp-gn.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.