Skip to main content

Security report for soutezpamatkaroku.cz

Sdružení historických sídel Čech, Moravy a Slezska, z.s. · Government · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

62/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website www.soutezpamatkaroku.cz represents a non-profit organization focused on the preservation of historical monuments in the Czech Republic through the 'Památka roku' competition. It serves heritage professionals, local governments, and the public by providing competition information, news, and resources. The organization is well-established with official registration and government partnerships, enhancing its credibility. Technically, the site uses a proprietary CMS (Public4u) with jQuery and Mapy.cz APIs, delivering a moderately performant and mobile-optimized experience. While the site is accessible and well-structured, it lacks some modern security headers and comprehensive privacy documentation, which are areas for improvement. Security posture is generally good with HTTPS enforced and no visible vulnerabilities, but the absence of WHOIS data reduces domain trustworthiness. The site does not employ advertising or extensive tracking, aligning with its non-profit nature. Overall, the risk is low, but enhancing transparency and security policies would strengthen trust. Strategic recommendations include implementing security headers, publishing privacy and terms policies, and improving WHOIS transparency to align domain registration with organizational legitimacy.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of soutezpamatkaroku.cz. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching soutezpamatkaroku.cz

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
40
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
25
Average
62

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention soutezpamatkaroku.cz, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for soutezpamatkaroku.cz right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The organization holds a niche position in the cultural heritage sector in Czechia, leveraging partnerships with government ministries and heritage associations. Its business model is non-profit, focusing on cultural preservation through public competitions and awareness campaigns. Revenue streams likely include government grants and sponsorships. The target audience includes heritage professionals, municipalities, and the interested public. The partnership ecosystem is strong with official cultural and governmental bodies, supporting its mission and outreach. Growth indicators include ongoing annual competitions and expanding digital presence.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enforced and no exposed sensitive data. However, the lack of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options is a gap. No incident response or security policy information is published, limiting transparency. GDPR compliance is partial, with cookie consent present but no clear privacy policy. The absence of WHOIS data is a concern for domain legitimacy. Overall, the security culture appears basic but functional, with room for formalizing policies and improving technical controls.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers (CSP, X-Content-Type-Options, X-Frame-Options) to mitigate common web attacks.
  2. Publish a detailed privacy policy and terms of service to improve legal compliance and user trust.
  3. Enhance GDPR compliance by clearly documenting data processing and retention policies.
  4. Improve WHOIS transparency by ensuring domain registration data is publicly available and consistent with organizational identity.
  5. Establish and publish an incident response policy and contact channel to demonstrate security readiness.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Sdružení historických sídel Čech, Moravy a Slezska, z.s.
Registration number
59007
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Sdružení historických sídel Čech, Moravy a Slezska, z.s.
Description
The website is dedicated to the 'Památka roku' competition, focusing on historical monuments and their preservation in Czechia. It provides information about the competition, winners, news, and related events.
Key services
Organizing the Památka roku competition, Publishing news and updates about heritage preservation, Providing resources for journalists and participants
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, jQuery UI, Public4u CMS, Mapy.cz API
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of secure forms with POST method

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is focused on cultural heritage and historical monument competitions.
  3. WHOIS data is unavailable, which is unusual and reduces domain trust score.
  4. No explicit privacy or terms of service pages found.
  5. Cookie consent mechanism is present and functional.
  6. Contact information is clearly provided with phone, email, and physical address.
  7. Use of multiple external trusted domains for social media and partners.
  8. No advertising or tracking scripts detected.
  9. Technical stack is based on older but stable technologies like jQuery and a proprietary CMS.
  10. Security headers are not detected in the HTML content; recommend improvement.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a legacy but stable technology stack centered on jQuery and a proprietary CMS (Public4u). It integrates external APIs such as Mapy.cz for mapping features. The site is mobile responsive and has a clear navigation structure. Performance is moderate, with no major issues detected. However, the absence of modern frameworks and security headers indicates some technical debt. There is an opportunity to modernize the stack, improve accessibility, and enhance SEO practices to boost user experience and search visibility.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 62/100Medium33 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with soutezpamatkaroku.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review soutezpamatkaroku.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.