Skip to main content

Security report for soulsrestaurant.co.uk

Other · N/a

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in SSL/TLS, DNS health and 2 other checks.

Security score

62/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website www.soulsrestaurant.co.uk is currently inaccessible and displays a generic 'Site not found' error page indicating that the site is unpublished or the domain is not assigned. The WHOIS lookup for the domain failed due to the domain name violating Nominet UK's naming rules, specifically that the domain contains too many parts, rendering it invalid and unregistered. Consequently, no registrant or domain status information is available. The lack of accessible content, absence of business information, and invalid domain status indicate that this website is not operational or legitimate at this time. From a technical perspective, the website does not provide any meaningful content or metadata. There are no forms, scripts, or analytics detected. The only external resources are fonts and images loaded from a third-party CDN. No security headers or HTTPS configuration details are available, suggesting a minimal or non-existent security posture. The website is not optimized for mobile or accessibility, and SEO elements are missing. Security-wise, the site shows no evidence of best practices such as HTTPS, security headers, or privacy policies. The domain's invalid status and lack of registrant data further diminish trustworthiness. There are no indications of vulnerabilities or incident response mechanisms due to the absence of content. Overall, the security posture is very weak, and the site is effectively non-functional. Given these findings, the overall risk assessment is high. The domain is not legitimate, and the website is inaccessible. Strategic recommendations include registering a valid domain name, implementing HTTPS, publishing privacy and cookie policies, adding business contact information, and developing a professional website with security best practices to establish trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      SSL Certificate Expires Soon

      SSL certificate expires in 28 days

      What to do: Renew SSL certificate before expiration

      • NIS2 21(2)(h)
      • IR 2024/2690 9.2(c): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 9.2(c): Cryptography
      • NIST SC-17: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-17: Public Key Infrastructure Certificates

  2. DNS health

    DNS sends visitors and email to the right servers. Misconfigured records can cause outages or let someone redirect your traffic.

    • High

      Unregistered MX Record

      MX record points to unregistered domain: soulsrestaurant-co-uk.mail.protection.outlook.com

      What to do: Remove or fix MX record pointing to unregistered domain

      • RFC 5321 §5.1
      • NIS2 21(2)(i)
      • IR 2024/2690 12.4: Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 12.4: Asset inventory
      • NIST CM-8: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-8: System Component Inventory

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching soulsrestaurant.co.uk

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
59
Security headers
45
Email security
70
DNS health
45
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
50
Average
62

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

No business intelligence can be derived from the current website content or WHOIS data due to the domain's invalid status and lack of published content. There is no information on market positioning, business model, revenue streams, or partnerships. The absence of contact details and company information precludes any meaningful analysis of the company's operations or market presence.

Security posture

The security posture of the website is minimal to non-existent. The domain is invalid and unregistered, and the website content is a generic error page. There is no HTTPS detected, no security headers, no privacy or cookie policies, and no incident response information. This indicates a lack of security maturity and readiness. The absence of any security best practices exposes the site to potential risks if it were to become active without proper safeguards. Compliance with GDPR or other regulations cannot be assessed due to missing policies and contact information.

Recommendations

  1. Register a valid domain name compliant with Nominet UK naming rules.
  2. Develop and publish a professional website with meaningful content and business information.
  3. Implement HTTPS with a valid SSL certificate to secure communications.
  4. Publish privacy, cookie, and terms of service policies to improve compliance and user trust.
  5. Add clear contact information including emails and phone numbers for customer and security communications.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Generic detected. The website displays a 'Site not found' error page indicating the site is unpublished or domain is not assigned. WHOIS lookup failed due to domain naming rules violation. Content is minimal and inaccessible. These observations may be incomplete. For a fuller analysis, contact guard@offseq.com.

Business

Content quality
poor
Branding
inconsistent

Technology

Performance
slow
Mobile
poor
Accessibility
poor
SEO
poor

Security

Observed score
10/100

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
poor
User experience
poor
Content relevance
poor
Navigation
poor
Professionalism
poor
Trustworthiness
low

Key observations

  1. Website is inaccessible and shows a 'Site not found' error page.
  2. No business or contact information is present on the site.
  3. WHOIS lookup failed due to domain naming rules violation.
  4. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found.
  5. No security headers or HTTPS detected from available data.
  6. No scripts, forms, or analytics detected in the HTML content.
  7. External resource loaded from irp.cdn-website.com for fonts and images.
  8. No social media or contact links present.
  9. Content safety rating is safe due to lack of content.
  10. Overall website quality and trustworthiness are very low.
Technical notes

Notes

The website currently serves only a minimal error page with no metadata, scripts, or structured data. External resources are limited to fonts and images from a third-party CDN. No CMS or frameworks are detected. The site lacks mobile optimization, accessibility features, and SEO elements. Performance is likely slow due to lack of content and optimization. The technical infrastructure appears incomplete or inactive, consistent with an unpublished or invalid domain.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with soulsrestaurant.co.uk. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review soulsrestaurant.co.uk.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.