Skip to main content

Security report for sonum-int.com

Sonum International · Other · N/a

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

68/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Sonum International is a business-oriented website focused on delivering impactful and efficient solutions, as indicated by its tagline. The company appears to have been established in 2010, supported by the domain age. The website is built on WordPress using the Divi theme and hosted on WP Engine, indicating a modern and reliable technical infrastructure. The site employs common analytics and tracking tools such as Google Analytics, Hotjar, and LinkedIn Insight, reflecting a moderate level of digital maturity. Security-wise, the website uses HTTPS and Google reCAPTCHA, but lacks DNSSEC and security headers, which are areas for improvement. Privacy compliance is weak due to the absence of privacy and cookie policies, and no clear contact or incident response information is provided. Overall, the website is functional and professional but would benefit from enhanced privacy, security, and transparency measures.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching sonum-int.com

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
15
Email security
72
DNS health
65
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
83
Average
68

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company targets organizations seeking efficiency and impactful business solutions, likely operating in a consulting or service delivery model. The domain age and hosting choices suggest a stable and established business. However, the lack of detailed service descriptions, contact information, and trust signals limits the ability to fully assess market positioning and competitive advantages. The use of popular marketing and analytics tools indicates an intent to engage and understand visitors, but the absence of privacy policies may affect user trust. No partnerships or subsidiaries are identified from the data.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic security posture with HTTPS enabled and the use of Google reCAPTCHA to protect forms. However, the absence of DNSSEC, security headers, and published security policies or incident response contacts indicates gaps in security maturity. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt files are present, limiting transparency and readiness for security incidents. The use of third-party analytics and tracking scripts introduces moderate user tracking, which is not fully balanced by privacy compliance measures. Overall, the security posture is adequate but requires enhancements to meet higher standards and compliance requirements.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to enhance DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Implement and publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with clear GDPR compliance statements.
  3. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security to improve protection against common web attacks.
  4. Publish an incident response policy and provide dedicated security contact channels (e.g., security@ or abuse@ emails).
  5. Consider adding a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to foster transparency and responsible reporting.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Sonum International
Description
Sonum International appears to be a business focused on providing impactful solutions with an emphasis on efficiency, as suggested by their tagline 'Less Effort. More Impact.'. Specific business description details are not explicitly found in the provided content.
Content quality
basic
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Hotjar, LinkedIn Insight Tag, Google reCAPTCHA, WordPress, Divi Theme
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Use of Google reCAPTCHA for form protection

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Hotjar, LinkedIn Insight
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Hotjar, LinkedIn Insight
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website uses modern tracking and analytics tools but lacks visible privacy and cookie policies.
  2. No explicit contact emails or phone numbers found in the content provided.
  3. No security or incident response policies published on the site.
  4. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file detected.
  5. Website is built on WordPress with Divi theme hosted on WP Engine.
  6. DNSSEC is not enabled, which is a security improvement opportunity.
  7. No visible trust indicators such as certifications or customer testimonials.
  8. Content is basic with limited business descriptive information.
  9. No forms detected in the provided content snippet.
  10. Social media links not explicitly found in the provided content.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a widely used CMS (WordPress) with the Divi theme, hosted on WP Engine, which is known for performance and security. The site uses modern analytics and marketing tools, including Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Hotjar, and LinkedIn Insight. The site appears mobile-optimized and has good SEO meta tags. However, the absence of DNSSEC and security headers indicates some technical debt in security configuration. Performance is moderate, likely influenced by multiple external scripts. Accessibility features are basic but present. Overall, the technical infrastructure is solid but could benefit from security hardening and privacy enhancements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with sonum-int.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review sonum-int.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.