Skip to main content

Security report for solvion.net

SOLVION information management GmbH · Technology · Austria

High risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, SSL/TLS and 2 other checks.

Security score

31/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

SOLVION information management GmbH is a well-established IT consulting and solutions provider specializing in digital workplace transformation within the Microsoft 365 ecosystem. With over 22 years of experience, the company serves medium-sized commercial enterprises primarily in the DACH region, focusing on sectors such as production, retail, services, and transportation. Their key services include strategic and technology consulting, adoption and change management, implementation of Microsoft-based solutions, and ongoing technical support. The website reflects a professional and consistent brand image with comprehensive content, active blogs, and customer testimonials, positioning SOLVION as a leading player in their market segment. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with the Divi theme and utilizes modern JavaScript libraries and marketing tools such as Google Tag Manager and Borlabs Cookie for consent management. However, the site suffers from a critical security shortfall due to the absence of a valid SSL certificate and lack of HTTPS support, which significantly impacts its security posture. Other security best practices like HSTS, OCSP stapling, and modern TLS protocols are also missing, exposing the site to potential risks. Privacy compliance is well addressed with clear privacy and cookie policies, including a consent mechanism that aligns with GDPR requirements. The site employs extensive tracking and marketing tools, but these are transparently disclosed. Contact information is clearly presented, including a detailed contact form, phone number, and physical address, enhancing business credibility. Overall, while the business and content aspects of the website are strong and trustworthy, the lack of HTTPS and proper SSL configuration is a critical vulnerability that must be addressed immediately to protect user data and maintain trust. Strategic recommendations include implementing a valid SSL certificate, enabling modern security protocols, and enhancing security headers to improve the site's security posture and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
18/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS encryption

      GDPR requires appropriate security measures for personal data

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate for HTTPS

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS Encryption

      Website does not use HTTPS encryption, making all data transmission vulnerable to interception

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate and redirect all HTTP traffic to HTTPS

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching solvion.net

This scan found 20 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
15
Email security
50
DNS health
85
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
18
Average
31

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

SOLVION operates as a specialized IT consulting firm focused on digital workplace solutions leveraging Microsoft technologies. Their market positioning as a leading provider in the DACH region is supported by a strong portfolio of services including cloud telephony, customer service solutions, intranet development, collaboration governance, AI integration with Microsoft Copilot, and low-code application development. The company targets medium to large enterprises with significant digital workforce needs, primarily in production, retail, services, and transportation sectors. Their business model revolves around consulting, implementation, and managed services, generating revenue through project engagements, support contracts, and training workshops. The presence of strategic partnerships, such as with Microsoft and technology vendors like skybow, enhances their competitive advantage. The active blog and event calendar indicate a growth-oriented and customer-engaged approach, while testimonials from notable clients reinforce their market credibility.

Security posture

The current security maturity of the website is low due to the absence of a valid SSL certificate and lack of HTTPS support, which is a critical vulnerability exposing users to data interception and undermining trust. The site does implement SPF and DMARC email policies with a quarantine policy, reducing email spoofing risks. However, the lack of modern TLS protocols, HSTS, OCSP stapling, and session resumption mechanisms indicates an immature security configuration. No explicit security policy or incident response information is found on the site, and no vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file is present. The use of cookie consent mechanisms and privacy policies demonstrates awareness of data protection requirements, but the technical security gaps represent significant compliance and operational risks. Immediate remediation is required to secure communications and protect user data.

Recommendations

  1. Implement a valid SSL/TLS certificate and enforce HTTPS across the entire website.
  2. Enable modern TLS protocols (TLS 1.2 or 1.3) and disable outdated protocols to enhance encryption.
  3. Configure HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS) with includeSubDomains and preload options to prevent protocol downgrade attacks.
  4. Enable OCSP stapling and session resumption to improve security and performance.
  5. Publish a security.txt file to facilitate responsible vulnerability disclosure and improve security transparency.
  6. Regularly audit and update security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  7. Maintain and update privacy and cookie policies to reflect current data protection laws and practices.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
SOLVION information management GmbH
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern WordPress platform using the Divi theme and several advanced plugins for layout, image galleries, and carousels. It uses jQuery and other JavaScript libraries for interactivity and integrates Google Tag Manager for analytics and marketing. The site is optimized with WP Rocket for performance but currently reports zero load time and resource counts, indicating possible measurement issues or caching effects. Mobile optimization is good with responsive design and adaptive content. SEO is well addressed with proper meta tags, Open Graph, and JSON-LD structured data. Hosting is via an IP associated with domaintechnik.at, a known DNS provider. However, the lack of SSL/TLS and HTTPS is a major technical deficiency that impacts security and user trust. The site uses extensive tracking and marketing scripts, which are managed via a comprehensive cookie consent mechanism.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with solvion.net. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review solvion.net.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.