Skip to main content

Security report for solixgroup.com

Solix Group · Manufacturing · Denmark

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers, SSL/TLS and 1 other check.

Security score

61/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Solix Group is a well-established investment company founded in 2014, focusing on B2B manufacturing and services in Northern Europe. The company positions itself as a leader in its market segment, emphasizing sustainable business practices and long-term value creation. The website reflects a professional and consistent brand image, with clear information about subsidiaries and contact details. Technically, the site is built on WordPress, leveraging modern technologies such as Google Tag Manager and Cookiebot for analytics and privacy compliance. The site is mobile-optimized and performs moderately well, with good SEO and accessibility features. Security posture is strong with HTTPS enforced and no visible vulnerabilities, although DNSSEC is not enabled and some security headers are missing. Privacy compliance is supported by a comprehensive cookie consent mechanism via Cookiebot, but no explicit privacy policy or terms of service pages were found in the provided content. Overall, the website demonstrates a mature digital presence with room for improvement in explicit privacy and security policy disclosures.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
100/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

  3. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • High

      High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

      Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

      What to do: Consider restricting access to FTP or implementing strong authentication

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching solixgroup.com

This scan found 20 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
20
Email security
85
DNS health
80
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
100
Average
61

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Solix Group operates as an investment holding company with a portfolio of subsidiaries in manufacturing and service sectors, targeting B2B clients primarily in Denmark and Sweden. The company leverages its subsidiaries to maintain market leadership and promote sustainability. The business model centers on long-term value creation through strategic investments. The presence of multiple subsidiaries indicates a diversified portfolio. The company maintains active contact channels and social media presence, enhancing its market visibility. The lack of explicit privacy and security policies on the website suggests an opportunity to strengthen compliance and trust. The use of Cookiebot and Google Analytics indicates a commitment to data-driven marketing and user experience optimization.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and uses Cookiebot for GDPR-compliant cookie consent, reflecting a good baseline security and privacy posture. However, the absence of DNSSEC and security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and Strict-Transport-Security reduces the overall security robustness. No security policy or incident response contact information is published, which could hinder effective communication in case of security incidents. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The site does not appear to be behind a WAF or security challenge, allowing full content access. Overall, the security posture is good but could be enhanced by implementing additional security headers, enabling DNSSEC, and publishing security policies.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to improve DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Implement security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security to harden the website against common attacks.
  3. Publish a clear privacy policy and terms of service pages accessible from the website footer or main navigation.
  4. Add a security policy and incident response contact information (e.g., security@ or abuse@ email) to improve transparency and readiness.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and libraries to ensure no vulnerable versions are in use and maintain compliance with privacy regulations.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
SOLIX GROUP AB
VAT number
SE556966-9574
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Solix Group
Description
Solix Group is a leading investment company in Northern Europe, focusing on B2B manufacturing and services, committed to long-term value creation and market leadership. Solix promotes sustainable business practices and equal opportunities for everyone.
Key services
Investment management, Subsidiary management, Sustainable business promotion
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, jQuery, Google Tag Manager, Cookiebot, Vimeo Player API
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Marketing tools
Cookiebot
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website uses Cookiebot for GDPR-compliant cookie consent
  2. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service page found in the provided content
  3. Contact information is clearly provided in structured data
  4. Website is professionally designed and well-branded
  5. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure found
  6. No security policy or incident response contact information found
  7. HTTPS is enforced with no visible issues
  8. No WAF or blocking mechanisms detected
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS, using jQuery and Google Tag Manager for analytics and tracking. Cookiebot is integrated for cookie consent management, supporting GDPR compliance. The site loads external scripts from trusted domains such as Vimeo and Google. DNS is managed via Key-Systems GmbH with Danish name servers, but DNSSEC is not enabled. The site is mobile responsive and uses modern meta tags for SEO and social sharing (Open Graph and Twitter cards). Performance is moderate, with some optimization possible. Accessibility features are basic but present. No critical technical debt or outdated technologies were detected, indicating a well-maintained infrastructure.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with solixgroup.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review solixgroup.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.