Skip to main content

Security report for solayer.org

Domains By Proxy, LLC · Other · United States

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

65/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website solayer.org is a newly registered domain (February 2024) currently protected by a privacy service (Domains By Proxy, LLC). The site is accessible without any WAF or security challenge blocking content. The technical infrastructure is modern, leveraging React, Framer, and a variety of contemporary JavaScript libraries and frameworks, indicating a high level of digital maturity. However, the website lacks substantive business content, contact information, and compliance policies such as privacy or cookie policies. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS enabled but missing critical security headers and public security policies. Overall, the site appears to be in an early development or pre-launch phase with limited trust indicators and business credibility. Strategic recommendations include adding comprehensive privacy and cookie policies, publishing contact and incident response information, and implementing security best practices to enhance trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching solayer.org

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
57
Security headers
40
Email security
85
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
65

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Due to the absence of explicit business descriptions or contact details, the market positioning and business model of solayer.org cannot be confidently determined. The domain is registered under a privacy protection service, which is common for new or small websites but reduces transparency. The technology stack suggests a focus on modern web and possibly blockchain or web3 technologies, given the use of Wagmi and RainbowKit libraries. No partnerships, certifications, or revenue streams are evident from the content. The target audience and growth indicators remain unclear. The lack of marketing or analytics tools suggests the site is not yet fully operational or publicly marketed.

Security posture

The security maturity level is moderate. HTTPS is properly configured, and the domain uses Cloudflare DNS, which provides some protection. However, the absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and HSTS is a notable gap. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure policies are published, which limits readiness for security incidents. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the analysis, but the lack of visible security best practices and policies reduces overall security confidence. Compliance with GDPR or other privacy regulations is not demonstrated due to missing privacy and cookie policies.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie policy with consent mechanisms.
  2. Add security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and HSTS to enhance protection.
  3. Publish contact information and incident response procedures to improve transparency and readiness.
  4. Enable DNSSEC to strengthen domain name system security.
  5. Develop and communicate a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to engage with security researchers.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Domains By Proxy, LLC
Description
No explicit business description found in the content. The domain is newly registered and appears to be under privacy protection.
Content quality
poor
Branding
inconsistent

Technology

Stack
React, Framer, Cloudflare DNS, JSPM CDN, Three.js, Firebase, Stripe, Wagmi, RainbowKit, Chakra UI, Material UI, React Router, Axios, Lodash, Moment.js, TailwindCSS
Frameworks
React, Framer
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
55/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Use of Cloudflare DNS

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
poor
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
low

Key observations

  1. Website content is accessible and not blocked by WAF.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found.
  3. No contact information or forms detected.
  4. Extensive use of modern JavaScript libraries and frameworks.
  5. Domain is newly registered with privacy protection.
  6. No security or incident response policies publicly available.
  7. No certifications or trust badges found.
  8. Website appears to be in early development or pre-launch state.
  9. No analytics or tracking services explicitly detected.
  10. No advertising or marketing tools detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern and extensive JavaScript technology stack centered around React and Framer, with integrations for blockchain/web3 libraries such as Wagmi and RainbowKit. Hosting appears to be supported by Cloudflare DNS, enhancing availability and some security aspects. Performance is moderate, with good mobile optimization and basic accessibility features. SEO optimization is basic, with meta tags present but no advanced SEO or structured data detected. The site lacks a CMS indication and appears custom-built. Technical risks include the absence of security headers and potential technical debt from the large number of external dependencies. Modernization opportunities include improving accessibility, SEO, and security configurations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with solayer.org. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review solayer.org.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.