Skip to main content

Security report for sol4.at

SOL4 IT-Consulting GmbH · Technology · Austria

High risk. 7 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, SSL/TLS and 2 other checks.

Security score

37/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

SOL4 IT-Consulting GmbH is a specialized IT consulting firm based in Austria, focusing on CRM software solutions and digitalization services for small and medium-sized enterprises. The company offers CRM software consulting, project implementation, industry-specific solutions, and support services, positioning itself as a market leader in CRM solutions within its region. The website reflects a professional and consistent brand image with comprehensive content tailored to its target audience. Technically, the site is built on Joomla CMS with modern UIkit framework and common JavaScript libraries, providing a good user experience and mobile optimization. However, a critical security gap exists due to the absence of a valid SSL/TLS certificate, resulting in no HTTPS support, which significantly impacts the site's security posture and trustworthiness. The site implements GDPR-compliant privacy and cookie policies with active consent mechanisms and transparent contact information. Overall, while the business and content quality are strong, the lack of HTTPS is a major risk that should be addressed promptly.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
18/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      Unable to retrieve SSL certificate

      Could not establish secure connection to retrieve certificate information

      What to do: Check if the server is accessible and SSL/TLS is properly configured

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching sol4.at

This scan found 16 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
50
Email security
50
DNS health
85
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
18
Average
37

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the technology sector, providing essential CRM consulting and software services primarily to SMEs in Austria. Its business model revolves around IT consulting, CRM project implementation, and ongoing support, leveraging partnerships with recognized CRM software vendors such as CAS genesisWorld. The presence of certifications and partner badges indicates a strong ecosystem and credibility. The company maintains active communication channels including phone, email, social media, and newsletter subscriptions, supporting customer engagement and lead generation. The website's content strategy focuses on educating and informing potential clients about CRM benefits and trends, reinforcing its market position. No parent or subsidiary companies were identified, suggesting an independent SME structure.

Security posture

The website's security posture is currently weak due to the complete lack of SSL/TLS encryption, exposing users to risks such as data interception and man-in-the-middle attacks. While several security headers are correctly implemented (X-Frame-Options, Referrer-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options), the absence of HTTPS negates many of these protections. No advanced security policies or incident response contacts are publicly available, indicating limited formal security governance. Cookie management and privacy compliance are well handled, but the critical missing HTTPS undermines overall security and user trust. Immediate remediation by installing a valid SSL certificate and enabling HTTPS is essential to improve security and compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Install and configure a valid SSL/TLS certificate to enable HTTPS across the entire website.
  2. Enable HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS) with includeSubDomains and preload directives.
  3. Implement OCSP stapling to improve certificate revocation checking performance and security.
  4. Publish a formal security policy and incident response contact information to enhance transparency.
  5. Conduct regular security audits and update server protocols to support TLS 1.2 or higher.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
SOL4 IT-Consulting GmbH
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a stable and widely adopted technology stack including Joomla CMS, UIkit framework, and jQuery libraries, which supports good design and mobile responsiveness. Hosting is managed via easyname.eu DNS servers. Performance metrics were not available, but the use of modern frameworks suggests moderate performance. SEO is supported by proper meta tags and Open Graph data. Accessibility is basic but functional. The lack of HTTPS is a significant technical risk. Cookie consent is implemented with a comprehensive notification bar and category management, reflecting good privacy practices. The site integrates third-party services such as LiveChat, Calendly, and Inxmail for marketing and customer engagement.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with sol4.at. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review sol4.at.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.