Skip to main content

Security report for softkittypa.ws

Other · N/a

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

63/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website softkittypa.ws is a personal portfolio and creative hub for Lexi, a self-taught programmer and math enthusiast. It showcases personal interests such as indie art, open source projects, Linux, programming, cats, and astrophotography. The site includes interactive elements like a Linux emulator and links to social and federated platforms, reflecting a community-oriented and privacy-conscious individual. The business model is non-commercial, focusing on personal expression and community engagement. Technically, the site uses modern web technologies including HTML5, CSS3, JavaScript with dynamic imports, WebAssembly for emulation, and canvas-based graphics. The performance is moderate with basic mobile optimization and accessibility features. SEO is basic but present through meta tags and Open Graph data. Hosting and CMS details are not explicitly provided. From a security perspective, the site uses HTTPS and avoids collecting sensitive data via forms, which reduces risk. However, no security headers such as CSP or HSTS are detected, and there is no privacy or cookie policy, which limits compliance with GDPR and other regulations. The site uses minimal tracking via a third-party stats service and includes a donation link. No vulnerabilities or malware indicators are found, but security posture could be improved with standard headers and policies. Overall, the site is safe and trustworthy for general audiences, with no adult or questionable content. The domain uses privacy protection, consistent with the personal nature of the site. Recommendations include adding privacy and cookie policies, implementing security headers, and enhancing mobile and accessibility features to improve compliance and security posture.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching softkittypa.ws

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
63

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention softkittypa.ws, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for softkittypa.ws right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The website operates as a personal portfolio and creative outlet rather than a commercial business. It targets a niche audience interested in programming, indie art, open source, and personal creative projects. The site leverages community and federated social platforms to build connections. Revenue streams appear limited to donations via Buy Me a Coffee. The site owner maintains an open source ethos with links to GitHub projects and source code. The partnership ecosystem includes various creative and technical communities, but no formal business partnerships are evident. Growth indicators are limited due to the personal nature of the site, but the presence of multiple social links and interactive features suggests active engagement.

Security posture

The security maturity level is basic to moderate. The site uses HTTPS and avoids sensitive data collection, reducing exposure. However, the absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security is a gap. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is provided, limiting transparency. Minimal tracking is used, but no cookie consent mechanism is present, impacting privacy compliance. The site owner appears privacy-conscious, using domain privacy protection and federated social links. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a personal site but would benefit from standard best practices to enhance protection and compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Implement standard security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security to improve security posture.
  2. Add clear privacy and cookie policies with GDPR compliance indicators and a cookie consent mechanism.
  3. Provide vulnerability disclosure information or a security contact to enhance transparency and incident response readiness.
  4. Improve mobile optimization and accessibility features to enhance user experience and security.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and dependencies for vulnerabilities and update them accordingly.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
Personal website of Lexi, a self-taught programmer and math enthusiast who shares interests in indie art, open source, Linux, programming, cats, and math. The site includes personal projects, blogs, astrophotography, and links to social and creative content.
Key services
Personal blogging, Astrophotography showcase, Open source project links, Interactive Linux emulator, Community/social links
Content quality
good
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
HTML5, CSS3, JavaScript (ES modules, dynamic import), WebAssembly (via v86 emulator), Canvas API, BroadcastChannel API
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
60/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS usage implied by og:url and twitter:url (https)
  • No forms detected to collect sensitive data
  • No exposed credentials or sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
stats.lea.pet
Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
stats.lea.pet
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Personal website with strong creative and technical focus
  2. No formal business or commercial entity detected
  3. No privacy, cookie, or terms policies present
  4. No forms or data collection beyond basic analytics
  5. Multiple social and federated contact links provided
  6. Use of modern JavaScript and WebAssembly for interactive features
  7. No security headers detected in provided data
  8. No WAF or blocking detected
  9. Minimal tracking and advertising presence
Technical notes

Notes

The website employs a modern technology stack with HTML5, CSS3, and advanced JavaScript features including dynamic module imports and WebAssembly for running a Linux emulator. The use of canvas and BroadcastChannel APIs indicates interactive and real-time capabilities. Performance is moderate with some custom animations and effects. SEO is basic but includes Open Graph and Twitter meta tags. No CMS or hosting provider details are evident. The site lacks some technical best practices such as security headers and comprehensive accessibility features. There is room for modernization in mobile responsiveness and performance optimization.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with softkittypa.ws. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review softkittypa.ws.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.