Skip to main content

Security report for softera.lt

Softera · Technology · Lithuania

Low risk. 3 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

78/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Softera is a Lithuanian technology company specializing in business digitalization solutions, primarily leveraging Microsoft Dynamics 365. The company targets manufacturing, trading, and service sectors, offering tailored software implementations to meet business needs. Their market position is that of a specialized B2B solutions provider within Lithuania, focusing on digital transformation. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with modern plugins and tracking tools such as Google Analytics, Microsoft Clarity, and Facebook SDK, complemented by a cookie consent mechanism via Cookiebot. The site is mobile-optimized and demonstrates good SEO practices, although accessibility features are basic. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced and no obvious vulnerabilities detected, but the absence of security headers and explicit security policies suggests room for improvement. The lack of WHOIS data and registrant transparency introduces some risk regarding domain legitimacy. Overall, the website is professional and functional but would benefit from enhanced privacy disclosures and contact transparency to improve trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
100/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching softera.lt

This scan found 18 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
30
Email security
85
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
100
Average
78

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Softera operates in the technology sector with a focus on Microsoft Dynamics 365 implementations and business digitalization for industrial and commercial clients. Their business model is B2B, serving medium-sized enterprises primarily in Lithuania. The company leverages partnerships with Microsoft and integrates various marketing and analytics tools to support growth. The website content and structured data indicate a consistent brand presence and a clear value proposition. However, the absence of detailed company registration data and contact information limits external validation. No subsidiaries or parent companies are identified. The company appears to maintain a moderate market position with potential for expansion through enhanced transparency and compliance.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate to good security maturity level. HTTPS is properly configured, and cookie consent is implemented, indicating awareness of privacy regulations. However, the lack of visible security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options reduces defense-in-depth. No security or incident response policies are published, and no vulnerability disclosure or security.txt files are present, which could hinder coordinated vulnerability management. The use of third-party scripts and tracking pixels is extensive, which may increase the attack surface if not regularly audited. No exposed sensitive data or known vulnerabilities were detected in the content. Compliance with GDPR is partially indicated by cookie consent but lacks a formal privacy policy. Incident response readiness and security culture indicators are not evident from the website content.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service to enhance legal compliance and user trust.
  2. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to improve protection against common web attacks.
  3. Provide explicit contact information including security and incident response contacts to facilitate communication and trust.
  4. Establish a vulnerability disclosure program or publish a security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting of security issues.
  5. Regularly review and audit third-party scripts and tracking tools to minimize security risks and ensure privacy compliance.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Softera
Description
Mes suprantame kaip dirba gamybinės, prekybinės ir paslaugų įmonės, todėl galime pasiūlyti verslo poreikius atitinkančius sprendimus.
Key services
Microsoft Dynamics 365 implementation, Business digitalization solutions, Consulting for manufacturing, trading, and service companies
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, LayerSlider plugin, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Facebook SDK, Tawk.to live chat, Cookiebot consent management, jQuery
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent implemented
  • Use of Facebook SDK and Google Analytics with async loading

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Microsoft Clarity
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Microsoft Advertising (AW-948500477), Microsoft Clarity, Facebook Pixel
Marketing tools
Cookiebot, Tawk.to live chat
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. WHOIS data is unavailable or invalid for the domain.
  3. Website uses modern tracking and marketing tools with cookie consent.
  4. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service found on the homepage content.
  5. No explicit contact emails or phone numbers found in the analyzed content.
  6. Website is built on WordPress with common plugins and fonts.
  7. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information found.
  8. SSL is properly configured and HTTPS is enforced.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress, utilizing popular plugins like LayerSlider and Tawk.to for enhanced user experience and engagement. Fonts are loaded from Google Fonts with preconnect optimizations. Analytics and marketing tools include Google Analytics, Microsoft Clarity, Facebook SDK, and Google Tag Manager, indicating a mature digital marketing infrastructure. The site is mobile-optimized and uses modern CSS and JavaScript techniques. Performance is moderate, with minified CSS and deferred script loading. However, accessibility features are basic, and no advanced frameworks or platforms beyond WordPress are detected. Hosting provider details are not disclosed. Technical debt appears low, but improvements in security headers and privacy documentation are recommended to reduce operational risks.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with softera.lt. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review softera.lt.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.