Skip to main content

Security report for soft4.eu

SOFT4 · Technology · N/a

Low risk. 3 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

77/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

SOFT4 is an international software solutions provider specializing in industry-specific applications built on the Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central platform. The company serves a B2B market with over 400 customers and 70 partners globally, positioning itself as a reputable mid-sized technology firm. The website reflects a professional digital presence with good SEO, mobile optimization, and a clear focus on business software solutions. Technically, the site is built on WordPress and leverages modern JavaScript libraries and third-party services such as Google Tag Manager, Cookiebot for consent management, and Tawk.to for live chat support. Security measures include HTTPS enforcement and bot protection via Google reCAPTCHA, although some security headers could be improved. Privacy compliance is well addressed with a comprehensive cookie consent mechanism and a privacy policy, but no explicit terms of service or security policy pages were found. Overall, the site demonstrates a moderate to good security posture and business credibility, with room for enhancements in security headers and incident response transparency.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching soft4.eu

This scan found 18 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
30
Email security
85
DNS health
90
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
83
Average
77

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the technology sector, focusing on delivering tailored software solutions integrated with Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central. Its business model revolves around direct customer engagements and a partner ecosystem, targeting medium to large enterprises requiring specialized ERP solutions. The presence of multiple analytics and marketing tools indicates an active digital marketing strategy. The lack of explicit contact emails or phone numbers suggests a preference for contact via web forms, which may impact direct customer engagement. The company maintains a consistent brand image and leverages trusted third-party services to enhance user experience and compliance. No parent or subsidiary companies were identified, indicating an independent operation.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and uses reputable third-party services for analytics, marketing, and chat, which is positive for security and user experience. The cookie consent mechanism is detailed and GDPR-compliant, reflecting good privacy practices. However, the absence of explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options represents an area for improvement. No visible vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the provided content. The lack of a published security policy or incident response contact reduces transparency and readiness for security incidents. Overall, the security posture is moderate with good foundational practices but could benefit from enhanced header configurations and formal security documentation.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and enforce security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to mitigate common web vulnerabilities.
  2. Publish a dedicated security policy page and provide clear incident response contact information to improve transparency and readiness.
  3. Add a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting of security issues.
  4. Consider providing direct contact information such as company emails or phone numbers to enhance customer trust and engagement.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and libraries to ensure no vulnerabilities are introduced and maintain up-to-date versions.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
SOFT4
Description
SOFT4 is an international brand for industry-specific software solutions built on the Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central platform. We have helped 400+ customers and 70+ partners grow and improve their business globally.
Key services
Industry-specific software solutions, Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central platform integration
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Google Tag Manager, Cookiebot, Tawk.to, Google reCAPTCHA, Owl Carousel, Magnific Popup
Frameworks
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Cookie consent with granular controls
  • Use of Google reCAPTCHA for bot protection
  • Use of Tawk.to chat with session cookies

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, LinkedIn Insight
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google
Tracking pixels
LinkedIn Insight, Cookiebot
Marketing tools
Cookiebot, Tawk.to
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website uses a comprehensive cookie consent mechanism with detailed cookie categorization
  2. No explicit privacy policy URL found in the truncated HTML but indicated by Yoast SEO and cookie consent references
  3. No visible email addresses or phone numbers in the provided content; contact is via form
  4. Multiple third-party scripts for analytics, marketing, and chat support are used
  5. No visible security.txt or vulnerability disclosure page
  6. No explicit terms of service page detected
  7. Website is built on WordPress with modern frontend libraries
  8. Good SEO metadata and structured data present
  9. No WAF or blocking mechanisms detected
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS with a modern frontend stack including jQuery, Owl Carousel, and Magnific Popup. It integrates multiple third-party services such as Google Tag Manager, Cookiebot for cookie consent, Google reCAPTCHA for bot protection, and Tawk.to for live chat. The site uses Google Fonts for typography and has structured data implemented via JSON-LD for SEO enhancement. Performance is moderate, with good mobile optimization and basic accessibility features. Hosting and domain registration appear legitimate and consistent with the business profile. Opportunities exist to improve technical security configurations and enhance accessibility compliance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with soft4.eu. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review soft4.eu.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.