Skip to main content

Security report for sodisce.si

Vrhovno sodišče Republike Slovenija · Government · Slovenia

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

55/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website sodisce.si serves as the official online portal for the Judiciary of the Republic of Slovenia, providing comprehensive information about the court system, judicial administration, court procedures, public registers, and legal knowledge. It targets Slovenian citizens, legal professionals, and judiciary members, positioning itself as the authoritative source for judiciary-related information in Slovenia. The site is well-structured, content-rich, and regularly updated with news and official announcements. Technically, the website employs a modern tech stack including Bootstrap for responsive design, Google Translate for multilingual support, and privacy-conscious Google Analytics implementations. Accessibility features are implemented via the ARCwa plugin, and cookie consent mechanisms comply with GDPR requirements. The site is mobile-optimized and demonstrates good SEO practices. From a security perspective, the site uses HTTPS with strong SSL configuration and employs cookie consent to manage user privacy. However, explicit security policies and incident response contacts are not publicly available, which could be improved. No vulnerabilities or suspicious activities were detected in the content or scripts. Overall, sodisce.si is a trustworthy, professional government website with a strong business credibility and good technical implementation. Strategic improvements could focus on publishing detailed security policies and incident response information to enhance transparency and user trust.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching sodisce.si

This scan found 30 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
20
Email security
55
DNS health
65
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
25
Average
55

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Sodisce.si operates as a government service portal for the Slovenian judiciary, providing essential public services and information. Its market position is strong as the official judiciary website, with no direct commercial competitors. The business model is non-commercial, focused on public service and transparency. Key services include court information, judicial reports, legal publications, and public registers. The site supports judicial transparency and public engagement through news, FAQs, and accessibility features. Partnerships with related judicial portals enhance its ecosystem. Growth indicators include regular content updates and active social media presence. The site’s operations reflect a mature digital government service with a focus on accessibility and compliance.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with enforced HTTPS, no exposed sensitive data, and privacy-conscious analytics usage. Cookie consent is implemented, supporting GDPR compliance. However, the absence of a published security policy and incident response contact reduces transparency. No security headers were explicitly detected in the HTML content, suggesting room for improvement. The site uses third-party scripts responsibly, but continuous monitoring is recommended. Overall, the security maturity is good for a government portal, with recommendations to enhance policy visibility and technical headers to further harden security.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a dedicated security policy page outlining security practices and user guidance.
  2. Provide clear incident response contact channels such as security@ or abuse@ email addresses.
  3. Implement and enforce security headers like Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  4. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance transparency by linking data retention policies and cookie usage details more prominently.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Vrhovno sodišče Republike Slovenija
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Vrhovno sodišče Republike Slovenija
Description
Official website of the Judiciary of the Republic of Slovenia providing information about courts, judicial administration, court procedures, public registers, legal knowledge, and public information.
Key services
Court system information, Judicial administration reports, Court procedures and announcements, Public registers access, Legal knowledge and publications, Public information and FAQs, Job postings and tenders
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery (commented out), Bootstrap (navbar classes), Google Translate API, Google Analytics (no-cookie variant), Cookie Consent by Arctur, ARCwa accessibility plugin
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented
  • Use of no-cookie Google Analytics scripts

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (no-cookie variant)
Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is an official judiciary portal for Slovenia.
  2. Content is comprehensive and regularly updated with news and legal information.
  3. Multiple accessibility features implemented.
  4. Cookie consent and privacy policies are present and GDPR compliant.
  5. No signs of malicious or suspicious activity.
  6. Social media presence on official channels enhances trust.
  7. No terms of service page detected.
  8. No explicit security policy or incident response information found.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a combination of Bootstrap for responsive design and custom CSS/JS for functionality. Google Translate integration supports multilingual users, and Google Analytics is implemented with privacy considerations (no-cookie variant). Accessibility is addressed via the ARCwa plugin, providing multiple visual contrast and text size options. The site is mobile-optimized with a clear navigation structure. Performance is moderate, with room for optimization in script loading and caching. No CMS was explicitly detected, suggesting a custom or government-managed platform. Hosting details are not disclosed. Overall, the technical infrastructure is solid but could benefit from performance tuning and enhanced security headers.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with sodisce.si. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review sodisce.si.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.