Skip to main content

Security report for sodecawebapps.com

Sodeca · Manufacturing · N/a

Medium risk. 9 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 2 other checks.

Security score

57/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Sodecawebapps.com is a web portal primarily designed for authenticated users to manage purchasing orders, likely serving internal staff or clients of Sodeca, a manufacturing company. The website features a login form with email and password fields, leveraging common web technologies such as Bootstrap, jQuery, and jsGrid for UI and data presentation. The domain is relatively new, registered in 2020, and aligns with the business branding and operations. However, the public-facing content is minimal, focusing on user authentication and order management functionality. From a technical perspective, the site uses a standard technology stack with Bootstrap and jQuery libraries, but lacks advanced SEO, accessibility, and mobile optimization features. The performance is moderate, and no CMS or hosting provider details are explicitly identified beyond the registrar. Security posture shows room for improvement: no HTTPS enforcement or security headers are visible, and the login AJAX endpoint lacks visible CSRF protection or bot mitigation mechanisms. Security-wise, the domain status clientTransferProhibited is a positive indicator against unauthorized domain transfers, but DNSSEC is not enabled, which could improve DNS security. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies are found, indicating low privacy compliance. No contact information or social media presence is provided, limiting transparency and user trust signals. Overall, the website serves its functional purpose but requires enhancements in security, privacy compliance, and user trust features to improve its risk profile and professional standing. Strategic improvements in HTTPS enforcement, security headers, privacy policies, and contact transparency are recommended to elevate the site's security and compliance posture.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching sodecawebapps.com

This scan found 27 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
67
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
55
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
57

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Sodeca operates in the manufacturing sector, providing specialized web applications for purchasing order management. The business model appears B2B, targeting internal users or clients needing access to order data. The domain age and WHOIS data are consistent with a medium-sized company founded around 2020. The website links to the main corporate site sodeca.com, indicating a partnership or parent relationship. The lack of public content and contact details suggests a focus on internal operations rather than broad customer engagement. No advertising or tracking technologies are present, indicating a low marketing footprint. The technology stack is standard but lacks modern CMS or advanced digital marketing tools. Growth indicators or subsidiaries are not evident from the data.

Security posture

The current security posture is basic with several gaps. The absence of HTTPS enforcement and security headers exposes the site to potential interception and clickjacking risks. The login form uses AJAX without visible CSRF tokens or CAPTCHA, increasing vulnerability to automated attacks or CSRF exploits. DNSSEC is not enabled, which could improve DNS integrity. No privacy or cookie policies are present, indicating compliance gaps with GDPR and related regulations. Incident response and security policy information are not disclosed, limiting transparency. The domain registration status clientTransferProhibited is a positive control against domain hijacking. Overall, the security maturity is low to moderate, requiring prioritized improvements in transport security, header implementation, and privacy compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTPS with HSTS to secure all website traffic and protect user credentials.
  2. Add essential security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Incorporate CSRF tokens and CAPTCHA or other bot mitigation on login forms to prevent automated attacks.
  4. Publish clear privacy and cookie policies to improve GDPR compliance and user trust.
  5. Enable DNSSEC for the domain to enhance DNS security and integrity.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Sodeca
Description
Sodeca is a company likely involved in manufacturing, providing web applications related to purchasing orders and user management. The website serves as a portal for authenticated users to access purchasing order data.
Key services
Purchasing order management, User authentication and session management
Content quality
basic
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Bootstrap, jQuery, jQuery UI, CanvasJS, jsGrid
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
poor

Security

Observed score
40/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of clientTransferProhibited domain status to prevent unauthorized transfers
  • Password input fields with strength indicator placeholder

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a login portal for internal or client use with minimal public content.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the main page.
  3. No contact information or social media links present.
  4. Uses common web libraries and frameworks but lacks advanced security headers and HTTPS enforcement details.
  5. WHOIS data is transparent and domain is relatively new but consistent with business.
  6. No advertising or tracking technologies detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a traditional web stack with Bootstrap 3, jQuery 3.2.1, jQuery UI, CanvasJS for charts, and jsGrid for data grids. The HTML structure is basic with minimal metadata and no SEO or accessibility enhancements. The login form collects email and password via AJAX to a backend service. No CMS or advanced platform detected. Hosting provider details are not explicit beyond the registrar. Performance is moderate with external CDN usage for libraries. Mobile optimization is basic, relying on Bootstrap responsiveness. No analytics or tracking scripts are present, indicating minimal data collection. The site lacks modern meta tags, Open Graph, or structured data. Overall, the technical implementation is functional but dated and lacking modern web best practices.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with sodecawebapps.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review sodecawebapps.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.