Skip to main content

Security report for sodeca.cl

SODECA · Manufacturing · Chile

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

69/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

SODECA is an established manufacturer specializing in industrial ventilation solutions, including smoke extraction, pressurization systems for evacuation routes, and air quality improvement. The company operates internationally with multiple country-specific websites, indicating a strong global presence. Their business model focuses on manufacturing, direct sales, and technical consulting services, targeting industrial clients and engineering sectors. The website content is professionally presented, with clear navigation and multilingual support, enhancing accessibility for diverse audiences. Technically, the website employs modern frontend technologies such as Bootstrap 5, FontAwesome, and Google Tag Manager for analytics. The site is mobile-optimized and includes a cookie consent mechanism compliant with GDPR, reflecting a mature digital infrastructure. Performance is moderate with good SEO and accessibility features, although some improvements in security headers could be made. From a security perspective, the site uses HTTPS with no visible vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data. However, it lacks explicit published security policies or incident response contacts, and no vulnerability disclosure mechanism is present. The WHOIS lookup failed due to an invalid query format, limiting domain registration insights, but the professional web presence and consistent branding suggest legitimacy. Overall, the website demonstrates a solid business and technical foundation with good security hygiene. Strategic enhancements in security policy transparency and WHOIS data accuracy would further strengthen trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, LinkedIn, YouTube, Cloudflare

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching sodeca.cl

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
77
Security headers
25
Email security
85
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
50
Average
69

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

SODECA holds a competitive position as a multinational manufacturer in the industrial ventilation sector. Their diversified product portfolio and consulting services provide multiple revenue streams. The presence of sister sites across Europe and the Americas indicates a broad market reach and operational scale. The company targets industrial and engineering customers requiring specialized ventilation solutions, leveraging technical expertise and digital tools like product selectors and CAD platforms to support sales and project design. Growth indicators include active social media engagement and multilingual content. The partnership ecosystem appears internal with sister domains, and no third-party payment or service processors were identified. Overall, SODECA exhibits a stable and professional business operation with potential for continued expansion.

Security posture

The website maintains a good security posture with mandatory HTTPS encryption and cookie consent mechanisms aligned with GDPR. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive information were detected in the HTML content. However, the absence of security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS), and X-Frame-Options reduces defense-in-depth. There is no publicly available security policy or incident response contact, which limits transparency and preparedness for security incidents. The lack of a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file further constrains external security collaboration. Overall, while the site is secure for general users, improvements in security policy publication and header implementation are recommended to enhance resilience and trust.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including CSP, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options to strengthen browser security.
  2. Publish a clear security policy and incident response contact information on the website to improve transparency and readiness.
  3. Establish a vulnerability disclosure program and consider adding a security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting.
  4. Verify and correct WHOIS domain registration data to ensure consistency and improve domain legitimacy trust.
  5. Continue maintaining GDPR compliance and enhance accessibility features to improve user experience and legal adherence.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
SODECA
Description
SODECA ofrece soluciones en ventilación industrial, evacuación de humos, presurización de escaleras, ventilación para túneles y mejora de la calidad del aire interior.
Key services
Ventilation system manufacturing, Smoke extraction systems, Pressurization control systems, Technical consulting, Software tools for product selection
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Bootstrap 5.2.3, FontAwesome 6.5.1, Google Fonts (Roboto), Google Tag Manager (gtag.js), CookieConsent v2.8.9
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Cookie consent with opt-in/out
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Google Analytics (via gtag.js)
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern and widely supported technology stack including Bootstrap 5 for responsive design, FontAwesome for icons, and Google Tag Manager for analytics integration. The site loads external resources from reputable CDNs, ensuring reliability and performance. Mobile optimization is good, with responsive navigation and layout. SEO is supported by proper meta tags and canonical links. However, no CMS or backend platform was identified, suggesting a custom or static site architecture. Performance is moderate, with potential improvements in caching and resource optimization. Accessibility is basic but could be enhanced with ARIA roles and better keyboard navigation support. Overall, the technical implementation is solid with room for incremental improvements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with sodeca.cl. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review sodeca.cl.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.