Skip to main content

Security report for socialpoint.es

Socialpoint · Technology · Spain

Medium risk. 3 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, SSL/TLS and 1 other check.

Security score

63/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Socialpoint is a well-established mobile game developer and publisher based in Spain, known for popular titles such as Dragon City and Monster Legends. As a member of Take-Two Interactive and Zynga, it holds a strong market position in the free-to-play mobile gaming sector. The website reflects a mature digital presence with modern technologies like React and Gatsby, optimized for performance and mobile devices. Security measures include HTTPS, security headers, and a comprehensive cookie consent mechanism, although explicit security and incident response policies are not publicly available. Overall, the site demonstrates a high level of professionalism and compliance with privacy regulations.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
63/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS encryption

      GDPR requires appropriate security measures for personal data

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate for HTTPS

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS Encryption

      Website does not use HTTPS encryption, making all data transmission vulnerable to interception

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate and redirect all HTTP traffic to HTTPS

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching socialpoint.es

This scan found 15 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
45
Email security
85
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
63
Average
63

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Socialpoint operates in the technology sector, focusing on mobile gaming with a free-to-play business model. Its target audience includes mobile gamers worldwide. The company benefits from its association with major industry players like Take-Two Interactive and Zynga, enhancing its credibility and market reach. The website content and social media integration indicate active engagement with its community and a focus on growth and innovation. The business model relies on game development and publishing, with revenue likely generated through in-app purchases and advertising.

Security posture

The website employs strong security practices including HTTPS enforcement and multiple security headers. The presence of a cookie consent banner and detailed privacy and cookie policies indicate good privacy compliance. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the content. However, the absence of a dedicated security policy or incident response page suggests room for improvement in transparency and readiness. Overall, the security posture is solid but could be enhanced by publishing more detailed security and incident response information.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response plan on the website.
  2. Add explicit contact channels for security incidents such as security@ or abuse@ emails.
  3. Consider publishing a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file.
  4. Enhance transparency by providing data retention policies and data protection officer contact details.
  5. Maintain and update third-party libraries to avoid potential vulnerabilities.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Socialpoint
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Socialpoint
Description
Socialpoint is a world-renowned game developer and publisher, specialized in mobile gaming. They develop popular games such as Dragon City, Monster Legends, Two Dots, Top Troops, Word Life, Tasty Town, and World Chef. They are a member of Take-Two Interactive and Zynga.
Key services
Mobile game development, Game publishing
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
React, Gatsby, Vimeo Player, OneTrust Cookie Consent
Frameworks
Gatsby
Platforms
Web, Mobile
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of security headers
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
OneTrust
Marketing tools
OneTrust Cookie Consent
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and well-structured.
  2. Strong presence of privacy and cookie policies with consent mechanisms.
  3. Active social media integration with official company accounts.
  4. No signs of WAF or content blocking.
  5. Use of modern web technologies and good performance.
  6. Clear business and contact information provided.
  7. No explicit security or incident response policies found.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using modern web technologies including React and Gatsby, ensuring fast loading times and good performance. It uses Amazon S3 for media hosting and integrates Vimeo for video content. The site is mobile-optimized and accessible, with proper SEO meta tags and structured content. The use of OneTrust for cookie consent demonstrates compliance with privacy regulations. No significant technical debt or performance issues were observed, indicating a well-maintained infrastructure.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with socialpoint.es. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review socialpoint.es.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.