Skip to main content

Security report for socaseiras.com.br

Other · Brazil

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in Email security, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

63/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website www.socaseiras.com.br is an adult content platform specializing in hosting and sharing amateur pornographic photos and videos, primarily targeting a Brazilian Portuguese-speaking audience. The business model revolves around user-submitted content and monetization through advertising partnerships with related adult sites. The site has a long content history dating back to at least 2006, indicating an established presence in its niche. Technically, the site uses legacy JavaScript libraries such as jQuery 1.11.2 and Owl Carousel for UI components, with Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager for analytics. Hosting and DNS are managed via Cloudflare, providing some level of performance and security benefits. The site is mobile optimized with basic SEO and accessibility features, but the overall technical implementation is moderate due to outdated libraries and lack of modern security headers. From a security perspective, the site uses HTTPS but lacks important security headers like Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options. The use of outdated JavaScript libraries introduces potential vulnerabilities. There are no visible privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies, which raises compliance concerns, especially under GDPR. Contact information is limited to a photo submission form, with no verified emails or phone numbers. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms are present. Overall, the site operates with basic technical and security maturity, serving a niche adult content market. Strategic improvements in privacy compliance, security hardening, and transparency would enhance trustworthiness and reduce risk.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching socaseiras.com.br

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
50
Email security
60
DNS health
60
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
63

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The website occupies a niche market in amateur adult content, leveraging user-generated photos and videos. Its competitive advantage lies in its extensive archive and community engagement through photo submissions. Revenue streams are primarily advertising-based, with multiple partner sites linked for cross-promotion. The target customers are adult users seeking amateur pornographic content, predominantly in Brazil. The site shows consistent content updates and a broad archive, indicating sustained user engagement. Partnerships with other adult sites form an ecosystem that supports traffic and monetization. However, lack of formal business information and compliance documentation limits its professional credibility.

Security posture

The security posture of the website is moderate but with notable gaps. HTTPS is enforced, which is essential, but the absence of key security headers reduces protection against common web attacks. The use of an outdated jQuery version is a significant vulnerability vector. No privacy or cookie policies are present, indicating non-compliance with data protection regulations. The lack of incident response contacts or vulnerability disclosure policies suggests limited readiness for security incidents. Tracking and advertising scripts are extensive, increasing the attack surface and privacy risks. Overall, the site requires improvements in security best practices and regulatory compliance to mitigate risks effectively.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to comply with GDPR and other regulations.
  2. Upgrade all JavaScript libraries, especially jQuery, to current secure versions.
  3. Add essential security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  4. Establish a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting.
  5. Enhance contact information transparency by providing verified company emails and phone numbers.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
Amadoras exclusivas em um acervo porno com fotos caseiras de sexo e fotos porno amadoras. Confira nossas videos de sexo.
Key services
Hosting and sharing amateur pornographic photos and videos, User submitted content via photo upload, Advertising space
Content quality
basic
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
jQuery 1.11.2, Owl Carousel, Google Analytics, Cloudflare DNS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
50/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Ad networks
Magsrv, Pemsrv
Tracking pixels
Tynt, Whos.amung.us, Dtscout, Waust.at
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
low

Key observations

  1. Website hosts adult amateur pornographic content primarily in Portuguese targeting Brazilian audience.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found, indicating poor compliance with privacy regulations.
  3. Contact available only via a photo submission/contact form; no emails or phone numbers found.
  4. Use of outdated JavaScript libraries may pose security risks.
  5. Advertising is prominent with multiple external adult-related partner sites linked.
  6. No explicit security headers detected; HTTPS is enabled but security posture is moderate.
  7. No structured data (JSON-LD) found for business or organization.
  8. SEO and accessibility features are basic; mobile optimization is good.
  9. No evidence of incident response or vulnerability disclosure policies.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a legacy technology stack with jQuery 1.11.2 and Owl Carousel for UI elements. Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager are integrated for user tracking and analytics. Hosting is supported by Cloudflare DNS, which may provide CDN and security features. The site is mobile responsive with basic SEO meta tags and Open Graph data for social sharing. However, the absence of modern frameworks or CMS indicates a custom or legacy platform. Performance is moderate, with asynchronous loading of scripts and lazy loading of images. Technical debt is evident in outdated libraries and missing security headers, which could impact stability and security. Modernization opportunities include upgrading libraries, implementing security best practices, and improving compliance documentation.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with socaseiras.com.br. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review socaseiras.com.br.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.