Skip to main content

Security report for snackfunp.com

Other · N/a

Medium risk. 9 critical or high findings in DNS health, Security headers and 3 other checks.

Security score

59/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website snackfunp.com appears to be a minimal content site primarily serving advertising and related search content. It lacks meaningful business information, contact details, or user engagement features. The site uses Google Adsense and Bodis syndicated search services for monetization. Technically, the site is basic with no detected CMS or advanced frameworks, and it lacks HTTPS and security headers, indicating a weak security posture. The WHOIS data is unavailable, suggesting privacy protection or a parked domain status, which further reduces trustworthiness. Overall, the site presents a low-risk profile in terms of content safety but scores poorly on professionalism, security, and business credibility.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. DNS health

    DNS sends visitors and email to the right servers. Misconfigured records can cause outages or let someone redirect your traffic.

    • Critical

      DNS Resolution Failed

      Unable to resolve domain A records

      What to do: Verify domain is properly configured and not expired

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching snackfunp.com

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
20
Email security
65
DNS health
55
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
53
Average
59

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The domain appears to be a parked or placeholder domain monetized through advertising networks such as Google Adsense and Bodis. There is no identifiable company or business entity associated with the site. The lack of registrant data and minimal content suggests no active business operations or market positioning. The target audience is general internet users who may click on ads or related search results. No strategic partnerships or subsidiaries are evident. The business model is advertising-supported content with no direct product or service offerings.

Security posture

The site lacks HTTPS, security headers, and any visible security policies or incident response mechanisms. No forms or user input fields are present, reducing attack surface but also indicating minimal user interaction. The absence of WHOIS data and use of a 'ww25' subdomain are suspicious and typical of parked or low-trust domains. There is no evidence of compliance with GDPR or other data protection regulations. Overall, the security maturity is low, with significant gaps in basic security best practices.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTPS with a valid SSL certificate to secure user connections.
  2. Add standard security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Provide clear and comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with consent mechanisms.
  4. Include verifiable business contact information to improve trust and credibility.
  5. Improve website content quality and user experience to enhance professionalism and engagement.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
See relevant content for snackfunp.com
Key services
display of ads, related search content
Content quality
basic
Branding
inconsistent

Technology

Stack
HTML5, CSS3, JavaScript, Google Adsense, Google Ad Services, Bodis Syndicated Search
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
30/100

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Adsense, Bodis
Tracking pixels
Google Ad Services
Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
poor
Content relevance
poor
Navigation
poor
Professionalism
poor
Trustworthiness
low

Key observations

  1. Website content is minimal and primarily advertising-based.
  2. No meaningful business or contact information is provided.
  3. WHOIS data is unavailable, indicating privacy protection or unregistered status.
  4. No HTTPS or security headers detected in provided data.
  5. No forms or user input fields present.
  6. No social media or contact emails found.
  7. Privacy and legal pages exist but are minimal and likely template-based.
  8. External links are mostly to Google ad services and syndicated search providers.
  9. No evidence of adult or explicit content.
  10. Website appears to be a parked or placeholder domain with monetization via ads.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses basic HTML, CSS, and JavaScript with integration of Google Adsense and Bodis advertising scripts. No modern CMS or frameworks are detected. The site lacks HTTPS and security headers, which is a critical technical deficiency. Performance appears moderate but cannot be fully assessed due to limited content. Mobile optimization is basic with minimal responsive design features. SEO is minimal with only basic meta tags present. The site is hosted on an unknown provider with no DNS or hosting details available from WHOIS. Overall, the technical infrastructure is minimal and outdated, posing risks to user trust and security.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with snackfunp.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review snackfunp.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.