Skip to main content

Security report for smuttyspass.com

Other · N/a

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in Email security, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

59/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

SmuttyPass.com operates as an adult subscription website providing access to sexually explicit content and affiliated partner sites. The business model centers on subscription access with member login functionality and uses third-party payment processors such as SegPay and Epoch to handle transactions securely. The website targets consenting adults aged 18 or 21 and above depending on jurisdiction, with clear age verification and terms acceptance mechanisms. The site includes privacy and terms policies hosted on a third-party domain, indicating some outsourcing of compliance documentation. From a technical perspective, the site employs older but functional technologies including jQuery 2.2.4, Bootstrap 3.3.1, and cookie management libraries. Google Analytics is used for visitor tracking, and cookie consent is implemented via a modal dialog with persistent cookies. The site is mobile responsive with basic accessibility features but lacks modern security headers and advanced SEO optimizations. Performance is moderate with no critical errors detected. Security posture is moderate but could be improved. HTTPS is implied but not explicitly confirmed in the data. No security headers such as Content Security Policy or HSTS were detected. The site does not expose sensitive data in the HTML but lacks explicit incident response or security policy disclosures. The absence of WHOIS registration data is a significant concern, reducing trustworthiness and raising questions about domain legitimacy. Overall, the site functions adequately for its business purpose but has notable gaps in security best practices and transparency. Strategic recommendations include implementing robust security headers, verifying domain registration status, enhancing privacy compliance disclosures, and improving accessibility and technical modernization to strengthen trust and reduce risk.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching smuttyspass.com

This scan found 27 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
52
Security headers
15
Email security
60
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
53
Average
59

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

SmuttyPass.com occupies a niche in the adult content subscription market, leveraging a network of partner sites to broaden its content offerings. Its competitive advantage lies in established payment partnerships with SegPay and Epoch, ensuring reliable transaction processing. The business model is subscription-based, targeting adult consumers seeking explicit content. The lack of direct company contact information and reliance on third-party privacy and terms hosting suggests a lean operational structure. Growth potential may be limited by domain registration concerns and minimal direct branding. The partnership ecosystem is strong within the adult content vertical, but the absence of social media or broader marketing channels limits brand visibility. Strategic focus on compliance and trust-building could enhance market position.

Security posture

The current security maturity level is moderate with basic protections such as cookie consent and HTTPS implied. However, the absence of explicit security headers (CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options) and lack of incident response contact information indicate gaps in security governance. No vulnerabilities were directly observed in the HTML content, but the use of older JavaScript libraries may pose risks if not regularly updated. Compliance with GDPR or other data protection regulations is minimal, with privacy policies outsourced and no clear data retention disclosures. Incident response readiness appears low due to missing contact channels. Overall, the security culture seems functional but could benefit from formalized policies and technical hardening.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including Content Security Policy, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options to mitigate common web attacks.
  2. Verify and publish domain WHOIS registration details to improve trust and legitimacy perception.
  3. Enhance privacy compliance by providing detailed data protection policies and GDPR adherence statements.
  4. Introduce explicit incident response contact channels such as security@ or abuse@ email addresses.
  5. Modernize technology stack by updating JavaScript libraries and improving accessibility features for broader compliance.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
Adult subscription website providing access to sexually explicit content and partner sites.
Key services
Adult content subscription access, Member login portal, Access to partner adult content sites
Content quality
basic
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
Google Analytics, jQuery 2.2.4, Bootstrap 3.3.1, js-cookie 3.0.5
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
50/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of HTTPS (implied by external links)
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is an adult content gateway with age verification warning.
  2. No WHOIS registration data available, indicating possible domain registration issues or privacy blocking.
  3. Uses third-party payment processors (SegPay, Epoch) indicating legitimate payment handling.
  4. Includes privacy and terms links hosted on a third-party domain (customercare.co).
  5. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found on the site.
  6. No explicit security headers detected in provided data.
  7. Cookie consent implemented via modal with cookie storage.
  8. Multiple partner adult content sites linked.
  9. No social media or direct company contact information present.
  10. Site uses older versions of jQuery and Bootstrap, indicating some technical debt.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a legacy technology stack with jQuery 2.2.4 and Bootstrap 3.3.1, which are functional but outdated. Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager are integrated for visitor tracking. Cookie consent is managed via js-cookie library with a modal dialog. The site is mobile responsive with basic CSS styling and layout. No CMS or hosting provider information was detected. Performance is moderate with no critical errors but could be improved by updating libraries and optimizing assets. SEO is basic with minimal meta tags and no structured data. Accessibility is basic with no ARIA roles or advanced features detected. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports the business needs but requires modernization to reduce technical debt and improve security.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with smuttyspass.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review smuttyspass.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.