Skip to main content

Security report for smocr.cz

Svaz měst a obcí České republiky · Government · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

55/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Svaz měst a obcí České republiky is a well-established non-profit association representing municipalities and cities in the Czech Republic. The organization provides a broad range of services including legal support, training, conferences, and digital tools such as an AI platform to support local governance. Their market position is strong as a leading national association with a clear focus on municipal development and advocacy. The website reflects a professional and consistent brand image targeting local government officials and members. Technically, the website uses modern frameworks like Bootstrap and jQuery, integrates Google reCAPTCHA for security, and implements cookie consent mechanisms, indicating a moderate level of digital maturity. However, the absence of a publicly accessible privacy policy and WHOIS data gaps reduce transparency and trust. Security posture is good with HTTPS and secure forms, but could be improved by adding security headers and incident response information. Overall, the site is safe, professional, and well-suited for its audience, but would benefit from enhanced compliance and transparency measures.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of smocr.cz. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
40/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Facebook, Twitter, YouTube, Google APIs

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching smocr.cz

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
67
Security headers
40
Email security
85
DNS health
75
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
40
Average
55

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The association operates in the government and non-profit sectors, focusing on municipal governance and regional development. Its business model revolves around membership services, educational events, legal assistance, and digital tools. The presence of an AI platform indicates innovation adoption. The organization maintains partnerships with related sites and has an active social media presence, enhancing outreach and engagement. The website content and structure support clear communication with its target audience of municipal officials and members. Growth indicators include regular events, training sessions, and digital newsletter distribution. The lack of WHOIS data is a notable anomaly but does not currently undermine the organization's operational credibility.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a good security baseline with HTTPS enforced and Google reCAPTCHA protecting forms against automated abuse. Cookie consent is implemented, supporting privacy compliance. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options is a gap that could expose the site to certain web-based attacks. No explicit security policy or incident response contacts are published, which limits transparency and preparedness communication. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the content. The site would benefit from publishing a security.txt file and enhancing header configurations to improve its security posture and compliance with best practices.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy page clearly linked from the homepage and footer.
  2. Add security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Publish a security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency.
  4. Create and host a security.txt file for vulnerability disclosure and incident reporting.
  5. Verify and update WHOIS domain registration information to ensure transparency and trust.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Svaz měst a obcí České republiky
VAT number
CZ63113074
Registration number
63113074
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Svaz měst a obcí České republiky
Description
Svaz měst a obcí České republiky is an association representing cities and municipalities in the Czech Republic, providing support, advocacy, and services to local governments.
Key services
Conferences and seminars, Legal assistance, Training and education, Electronic newsletters, Interactive AI platform (PASMO), Regional development initiatives
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery 3.4.1, Font Awesome, Swiper.js, Google reCAPTCHA v3, SmartMenus jQuery plugin, FenomioFlow CMS (implied by footer link)
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Google reCAPTCHA v3 integration on forms
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Google reCAPTCHA, Mailchimp (campaign-archive.com)
Marketing tools
Mailchimp newsletter
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and navigation.
  2. No WHOIS data available, which is unusual and warrants further investigation.
  3. Cookie consent and privacy mechanisms partially implemented but privacy policy page is missing or not linked.
  4. Multiple contact methods including form, email, phone, and physical address provided.
  5. Use of modern web technologies and security features like HTTPS and reCAPTCHA.
  6. No explicit security policy or incident response information found.
  7. Social media presence is active and linked.
  8. Content is professional, relevant, and targeted at municipal government stakeholders.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern tech stack including Bootstrap, jQuery, Font Awesome, and Swiper.js for UI components and responsiveness. Google reCAPTCHA v3 is integrated for bot protection. The CMS appears to be FenomioFlow, a specialized content management system. Performance is moderate with responsive design and mobile optimization evident. SEO is supported by proper meta tags and structured navigation. Accessibility is basic but could be improved with enhanced ARIA roles and keyboard navigation support. Hosting provider details are not explicitly available. The site uses external resources from trusted domains such as Google Fonts and YouTube. Overall, the technical implementation supports a professional and functional user experience with room for security and accessibility enhancements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 55/100Medium30 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with smocr.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review smocr.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.