Skip to main content

Security report for smithers.com

Smithers · Other · United States

Medium risk. 3 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

71/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Smithers is a well-established global provider of scientific testing, consulting, certification, market intelligence, and cybersecurity services. The company serves a broad range of industries including energy, transportation, healthcare, agricultural science, and manufacturing. Their website reflects a mature business with a large scale and a history dating back to 1925. The company emphasizes trusted expertise, high-touch service, and comprehensive certifications such as ISO 27001, CMMC, and NIST 800-171. Technically, the website is built on a modern CMS (Kentico) with JavaScript frameworks and includes features like carousels and search forms, indicating a good level of digital maturity. Security posture is strong with HTTPS and secure forms, though the absence of visible security headers and WHOIS data are minor concerns. Privacy compliance is well addressed with clear policies and cookie consent mechanisms. Overall, the website projects professionalism and trustworthiness, supporting Smithers' market position as a leader in their domain.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching smithers.com

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
65
Security headers
35
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
83
Average
71

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Smithers operates in multiple sectors with a diversified service portfolio, including testing, consulting, auditing, market reports, events, and training. Their competitive advantage lies in their extensive certifications, expert personnel, and global reach. The business model is service-oriented, targeting corporate clients requiring scientific and regulatory compliance services. The presence of subsidiaries like Reschem and regional partners such as smithers.cn indicates a strategic partnership ecosystem. The company targets industries with stringent quality and regulatory requirements, positioning itself as a trusted partner for compliance and innovation. Growth indicators include expansion into cybersecurity services and digital market intelligence platforms. The website content and structure support a professional brand image and facilitate client engagement.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and uses secure login forms with validation, reflecting good security hygiene. The presence of certifications like ISO 27001 and CMMC further indicates a strong internal security framework. However, the lack of visible security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), HSTS, and X-Frame-Options is a gap that could be addressed to enhance protection against common web attacks. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is publicly available, which could be improved to demonstrate transparency and readiness. The cookie consent banner and privacy policy indicate compliance with GDPR and related regulations. Overall, the security posture is solid but could benefit from additional hardening and transparency measures.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and configure security headers including CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection to strengthen web security.
  2. Publish an incident response plan or security contact information to improve transparency and facilitate vulnerability reporting.
  3. Add a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible security research and reporting.
  4. Regularly audit and update third-party libraries and CMS components to mitigate risks from vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance WHOIS domain registration transparency if possible to improve trust and legitimacy perception.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Smithers
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Smithers
Description
Backed by proven expertise and deep industry experience, our portfolio of trusted scientific services and market insights provide you with clarity - and confidence - for the decisions you make.
Key services
Testing, Consulting, Audit and Certification, Market Reports, Events, Training, Information Security Services
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Kentico CMS, jQuery, Google Tag Manager, Swiper Carousel, Modernizr
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Secure login forms with validation
  • Cookie consent banner

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and no blocking detected
  2. Strong presence of certifications and industry standards
  3. Multiple expert profiles and detailed service offerings
  4. Cookie consent and privacy policy present and GDPR compliant
  5. WHOIS data missing, which is a concern but not uncommon for privacy-protected domains
  6. No visible security headers detected in HTML source
  7. Use of modern JavaScript libraries and CMS (Kentico)
  8. Contact information clearly provided with phone numbers and physical address
  9. Social media presence on LinkedIn, Twitter (X), YouTube, Instagram
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on Kentico CMS with modern JavaScript libraries such as jQuery and Swiper for UI components. Google Tag Manager is used for analytics and marketing tracking. The site is mobile responsive with good accessibility and SEO optimization. Performance is moderate, likely due to rich media content and dynamic elements. The technical stack is mature and well-maintained, supporting a professional user experience. Opportunities exist to improve security headers and possibly optimize loading speed further. The use of a cookie consent banner and privacy policies indicates attention to regulatory compliance. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports the business goals effectively with room for incremental improvements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with smithers.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review smithers.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.