Skip to main content

Security report for smilestory.lv

smilestory.lv · E-commerce · Latvia

Low risk. 2 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

77/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

smilestory.lv is a Latvian website focused on providing expert advice for dental health and promoting products related to achieving an ideal smile. The site operates on a WordPress platform with WooCommerce integration, indicating an e-commerce component likely selling dental or health-related products. The website targets a general Latvian-speaking audience interested in dental care and oral health. Technically, the site uses modern web technologies including Bootstrap, jQuery, and various WordPress plugins for enhanced user experience and marketing analytics. It integrates Google Analytics and Facebook Pixel for tracking user interactions and marketing effectiveness. Security-wise, the site enforces HTTPS and employs a cookie consent mechanism via Cookiebot, but lacks visible HTTP security headers and explicit privacy or terms of service pages, which are areas for improvement. No WHOIS data was available due to query limits, but the website content and technical setup suggest a legitimate small business presence. Overall, the site is professionally designed with good content quality and moderate security posture, suitable for its business model and audience.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
100/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

2 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching smilestory.lv

This scan found 18 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
40
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
100
Average
77

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business operates in the e-commerce sector with a focus on dental health advice and related products, serving primarily the Latvian market. The business model combines content provision with product sales, leveraging WooCommerce for online transactions. The site demonstrates consistent branding and good content relevance, positioning itself as a trusted local resource for dental care. Marketing efforts include Google and Facebook tracking tools, indicating active digital marketing strategies. The absence of explicit contact information and privacy policies suggests room for enhancing transparency and customer trust. No partnerships or subsidiaries were identified from the website content. The company appears to be a small-sized entity founded around 2021, with a focus on niche dental health services and products.

Security posture

The website benefits from HTTPS encryption and a comprehensive cookie consent mechanism compliant with GDPR principles, enhancing user privacy and data protection. However, the lack of HTTP security headers such as Content Security Policy, X-Frame-Options, and HSTS reduces the overall security robustness. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. The site uses reputable third-party services for analytics and marketing, but continuous monitoring of these integrations is recommended to mitigate potential risks. The absence of explicit security policies or incident response contacts limits the site's preparedness for security incidents. Overall, the security posture is moderate with clear opportunities for strengthening defenses and compliance documentation.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTP security headers including CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection to enhance security posture.
  2. Publish clear and comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service pages accessible from the homepage.
  3. Add explicit contact information including company emails and phone numbers to improve business credibility and user trust.
  4. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and plugins to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  5. Develop and publish an incident response policy and contact channels to demonstrate security readiness.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
smilestory.lv
Description
Website providing expert recommendations for achieving your dream smile.
Key services
Expert advice on dental care, E-commerce product sales (implied by WooCommerce presence)
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, WooCommerce, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Cookiebot, jQuery, Bootstrap, Slick Carousel, Selectric, Woo Variation Swatches, WooCommerce Social Login, PixelYourSite
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent mechanism
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Ad networks
Google
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel
Marketing tools
PixelYourSite, Klaviyo
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge.
  2. WHOIS data unavailable due to query limit error; no registrar or domain age info extracted.
  3. Cookie consent implemented with detailed cookie categories and descriptions.
  4. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service pages found in HTML content.
  5. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly found in the HTML content.
  6. Website uses modern WordPress plugins and technologies for e-commerce and tracking.
  7. Google Analytics and Facebook Pixel tracking present with moderate user tracking.
  8. No security headers detected in HTML source; SSL is enabled and appears well configured.
  9. Content is in Latvian language, focused on dental health advice and related products.
  10. No adult or questionable content detected; content is safe for general audiences.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS with WooCommerce for e-commerce functionality, supported by Bootstrap for responsive design and jQuery for interactivity. It integrates multiple marketing and analytics tools such as Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, and PixelYourSite, alongside Cookiebot for cookie consent management. The site loads multiple CSS and JS assets from both local and CDN sources, indicating a hybrid hosting and delivery approach. Performance is moderate with room for optimization, especially in script loading strategies and accessibility improvements. The site is mobile optimized and SEO friendly with proper meta tags and structured data. Hosting provider details are not explicitly available from the HTML content. Overall, the technical infrastructure is modern and suitable for a small to medium-sized e-commerce business.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with smilestory.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review smilestory.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.