Skip to main content

Security report for smicro.eu

Anafra · Technology · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 10 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

58/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Anafra operates a specialized e-commerce platform focused on server hardware, components, and IT services, prominently featuring Supermicro builds. The website targets IT professionals and businesses in European markets, offering a broad catalog of products and services including virtual private servers, IT management, hosting, and warranty services. The platform supports multiple languages and currencies, enhancing accessibility for its target audience. Technically, the website employs a modern tech stack with jQuery, Google Tag Manager, Microsoft Clarity, and live chat integrations, indicating a mature digital infrastructure. Performance and mobile optimization are adequate, though accessibility features could be improved. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforcement, captcha on login forms, and cookie consent mechanisms, but lacks explicit security headers and published security policies. Overall, the website is professional, trustworthy, and compliant with GDPR cookie consent requirements, though it would benefit from enhanced transparency in security and privacy policies.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching smicro.eu

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
20
Email security
45
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
25
Average
58

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Anafra positions itself as a niche technology hardware and IT services provider, leveraging partnerships with major server brands like Supermicro. Its business model centers on e-commerce sales combined with IT service offerings, targeting medium-sized enterprises and IT professionals. The company demonstrates consistent branding and a comprehensive product catalog, supporting multiple European markets via language and currency options. The presence of advanced cookie consent and analytics tools suggests a data-driven approach to marketing and customer engagement. However, the absence of visible contact emails or phone numbers in the analyzed content may limit direct customer communication. The partnership with domains like anafra.eu indicates a broader ecosystem supporting the business. Strategic growth could focus on expanding transparency and customer support channels.

Security posture

The website exhibits a moderate to good security maturity level. HTTPS is enforced site-wide, and login forms implement captcha tokens to mitigate automated attacks. Cookie consent is managed with granular user controls, reflecting GDPR compliance. However, the site lacks explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options, which are recommended to enhance protection against common web vulnerabilities. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the provided content. Incident response and security policy documentation are absent, which could hinder rapid response to security events. Overall, the security posture is adequate for an e-commerce platform but could be strengthened by adopting additional best practices and transparency measures.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a comprehensive security policy and incident response contact information.
  2. Add explicit security headers (CSP, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options) to improve web security.
  3. Publish terms of service and vulnerability disclosure policies to enhance transparency and trust.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to meet compliance standards and improve user experience.
  5. Provide clear company contact emails and phone numbers on the website to facilitate customer support.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Anafra
Description
Anafra operates an e-commerce platform specializing in server hardware, components, and IT services, including Supermicro builds and related technology solutions.
Key services
Supermicro server builds, Virtual private servers, IT management, Hosting, Warranty services, IT audit, Camera systems, Data network administration
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Google Tag Manager, Microsoft Clarity, MailerLite, Luigisbox autocomplete, Limetalk live chat
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Captcha token on login form
  • Cookie consent with opt-in/opt-out
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (via GTM), Microsoft Clarity
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Ads
Tracking pixels
Microsoft Clarity, Leady.cz, Lfeeder
Marketing tools
MailerLite
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website uses HTTPS and modern tracking tools.
  2. Cookie consent is implemented with advanced settings.
  3. Multiple language and currency options available.
  4. Comprehensive product and service catalog for IT hardware.
  5. No explicit privacy or security policy pages beyond cookie policy.
  6. No visible contact emails or phone numbers in the provided HTML.
  7. Login and registration forms use captcha tokens for security.
  8. No signs of malware or phishing detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a custom or unknown CMS with a technology stack including jQuery, Google Tag Manager, Microsoft Clarity, and third-party marketing and live chat tools. The site is mobile optimized with responsive design elements and supports multiple languages and currencies. Performance is moderate, with asynchronous loading of scripts to improve speed. SEO is basic with meta tags and Open Graph properties present but could be enhanced with structured data. No major technical debt or outdated libraries were detected, but the site would benefit from improved accessibility and security header implementation. Hosting provider details are not explicitly identified from the content.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with smicro.eu. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review smicro.eu.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.