Skip to main content

Security report for sluzbyprozvirata.cz

Bulkhead Inspector, s.r.o. · Other · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

63/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website www.sluzbyprozvirata.cz represents a small Czech company, Bulkhead Inspector, s.r.o., specializing in holistic physiotherapy and rehabilitation services for animals including horses, dogs, and cats. The business also offers educational workshops and courses targeting animal owners and professionals in veterinary physiotherapy. The site is well-structured with clear service descriptions and contact information, supported by social media channels on Facebook and YouTube, enhancing its market presence in a niche sector. Technically, the website is built on Ruby on Rails with custom CMS features and uses Google Fonts for typography. It is mobile-optimized and provides a good user experience with clear navigation. However, performance is moderate and accessibility features are basic. Security measures include CSRF token implementation, but lack visible HTTP security headers and explicit SSL/TLS configuration details. From a security and compliance perspective, the site lacks visible privacy and cookie policies, which is a significant compliance gap under GDPR. WHOIS data for the domain is unavailable, raising concerns about domain registration legitimacy and trustworthiness. No signs of tracking or analytics scripts were found, indicating minimal user data collection. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be improved with better header implementation and policy disclosures. Strategically, the business should prioritize establishing clear privacy and cookie policies, enhance security headers, and clarify domain registration details to improve trust. The website content and business model are solid, but technical and compliance improvements will strengthen its digital maturity and customer confidence.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching sluzbyprozvirata.cz

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
55
Email security
60
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
63

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention sluzbyprozvirata.cz, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
1
Employees
0
Customers
0
Third parties
1
Weak passwords
0%

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for sluzbyprozvirata.cz.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Bulkhead Inspector, s.r.o. operates in a specialized niche of holistic animal care and physiotherapy in the Czech Republic. The company leverages a service-based business model focusing on direct client services and educational offerings. Its competitive advantage lies in combining multiple rehabilitative techniques and offering certified courses, positioning it as a knowledge leader in this domain. The target customers include animal owners seeking preventive and rehabilitative care and professionals pursuing specialized training. The company maintains a modest size with a focused local market presence and uses social media to extend reach. Growth potential exists through expanding course offerings and increasing awareness of holistic animal therapies. Partnerships appear limited but include a web service provider. Revenue streams are primarily service fees and course enrollments.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level. The presence of CSRF tokens indicates awareness of common web security threats. However, the absence of key HTTP security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options reduces protection against common web attacks. The lack of visible privacy and cookie policies suggests compliance gaps with GDPR and related regulations. No incident response or security contact information is provided, limiting readiness for security events. The missing WHOIS data raises concerns about domain legitimacy and potential risks. No vulnerable libraries or exposed sensitive data were detected. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a small business but requires enhancements to meet best practices and regulatory requirements.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to ensure GDPR compliance.
  2. Add and configure HTTP security headers including CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection.
  3. Verify and publish domain registration details to improve trust and legitimacy.
  4. Establish a security incident response contact channel and disclose it on the website.
  5. Conduct regular security audits and update SSL/TLS configurations to maintain strong encryption standards.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Bulkhead Inspector, s.r.o.
VAT number
CZ 27086348
Registration number
27086348
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Bulkhead Inspector, s.r.o.
Description
Centrum holistické péče o zvířata poskytující fyzioterapeutickou a rehabilitační péči pro koně, psy, kočky a další zvířata. Nabízí také kurzy, workshopy a lektorskou činnost v oblasti péče o zvířata.
Key services
Fyzioterapeutická péče o zvířata, Rehabilitační techniky, Kurzy a workshopy, Lektorská činnost
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Ruby on Rails, Google Fonts, JavaScript
Frameworks
Ruby on Rails
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
60/100
Good practices seen
  • CSRF token present in meta tags

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content about holistic animal care services.
  2. No privacy or cookie policies found, which is a compliance gap.
  3. WHOIS data is missing, which is unusual and may indicate domain registration issues or privacy protection.
  4. Contact information is clearly presented with company phone, email, and physical address.
  5. No visible security headers detected; CSRF token present indicating some security awareness.
  6. No analytics or tracking scripts detected, indicating minimal user tracking.
  7. Social media presence on Facebook and YouTube supports business credibility.
  8. Website uses Ruby on Rails framework with custom CMS and Google Fonts.
  9. No signs of adult or unsafe content; content is safe for general audiences.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a Ruby on Rails framework with custom CMS capabilities, leveraging Google Fonts for typography. The site is mobile responsive and offers a good user experience with clear navigation and well-organized content. Performance is moderate, with no explicit indicators of optimization or CDN usage. Accessibility features are basic, with room for improvement in ARIA roles and semantic markup. SEO optimization is basic, with meta tags present but no structured data or Open Graph tags detected. No analytics or tracking scripts were found, indicating minimal technical overhead and user tracking. The absence of visible security headers and incomplete WHOIS data represent technical risks that should be addressed to improve overall site robustness and trust.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with sluzbyprozvirata.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review sluzbyprozvirata.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.