Skip to main content

Security report for slsk.sk

Slovenská lesnícka komora · Other · Slovakia

Medium risk. 9 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

57/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Slovenská lesnícka komora is a Slovak non-profit, non-political, and self-governing institution established by law to represent the common interests of its members in forestry policy and development. The organization targets forestry professionals and stakeholders within Slovakia, providing advocacy, education, and informational services. The website reflects a professional presence with clear branding and relevant content focused on forestry activities, education, and news. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with modern plugins and is hosted by a reputable provider with DNSSEC and HTTPS properly configured. However, it lacks some security best practices such as security headers and formal privacy and cookie policies. The security posture is solid but could be improved with additional measures and transparency. Overall, the site is trustworthy, well-maintained, and serves its intended audience effectively.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching slsk.sk

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
85
Security headers
15
Email security
85
DNS health
45
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
57

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The Slovenská lesnícka komora holds a recognized position as a national forestry chamber in Slovakia, legally established and active since at least 2013 online. Its business model is non-profit, focusing on member advocacy, education, and forestry sector development. The organization maintains partnerships with various forestry-related institutions and educational bodies, as evidenced by linked partner domains. The website content and structure support its role as an information hub and professional resource. Growth indicators include active news updates and educational content. The absence of commercial advertising or tracking suggests a focus on member service rather than revenue generation.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a good security baseline with HTTPS and DNSSEC enabled, reducing risks of interception and DNS spoofing. However, the absence of security headers like Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options reduces protection against common web attacks. No vulnerability disclosure or incident response information is provided, which limits transparency and preparedness for security incidents. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the provided content. The site does not appear to collect user data via forms on the homepage, reducing attack surface. Overall, the security posture is adequate but could be enhanced with standard web security practices and compliance documentation.

Recommendations

  1. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to improve GDPR compliance and user trust.
  2. Implement standard security headers (CSP, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options) to harden the website against attacks.
  3. Add a security.txt file and vulnerability disclosure policy to facilitate responsible reporting and incident response.
  4. Include incident response contact information such as security@ or abuse@ email addresses.
  5. Regularly audit and update WordPress plugins and themes to mitigate vulnerabilities.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Slovenská lesnícka komora
Description
Je neštátna, nepolitická a samosprávna inštitúcia, zriadená zákonom č. 259/1993 z.z. o Slovenskej lesníckej komore v znení neskorších predpisov, ktorej poslaním je uplatňovať oprávnené spoločné záujmy svojich členov pri tvorbe hospodárskej a sociálnej politiky a zúčastňovať sa na jej uskutočňovaní v záujme rozvoja a zveľaďovania lesníctva v Slovenskej republike.
Key services
advocacy for members' interests, dual and professional education, publishing forestry videos and news, organizing events and seminars
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 6.4.5, Yoast SEO plugin, Slider Revolution 6.6.18, jQuery 3.7.1, Fusion Builder
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • DNSSEC enabled

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is in Slovak language targeting forestry professionals and members.
  3. No explicit privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the homepage or footer.
  4. Contact information is clearly presented with official email and phone number.
  5. Social media presence on Facebook and YouTube is active.
  6. Website uses WordPress CMS with common plugins like Yoast SEO and Slider Revolution.
  7. No visible forms for data collection on the homepage.
  8. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information found.
  9. SSL and DNSSEC are properly configured, but security headers are missing.
  10. No advertising or tracking scripts detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress 6.4.5 using Yoast SEO and Slider Revolution plugins, indicating a modern CMS environment with SEO optimization. Hosting is provided by Websupport, a known Slovak hosting provider, with DNSSEC enabled for domain security. The site uses jQuery 3.7.1 and Fusion Builder for layout and design. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and basic accessibility features. SEO is enhanced by meta tags, Open Graph, and JSON-LD structured data. There is no evidence of heavy tracking or advertising scripts, which benefits privacy and performance. Technical risks include missing security headers and lack of formal privacy and security documentation.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with slsk.sk. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review slsk.sk.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.