Skip to main content

Security report for slovensko.sk

NASES · Government · Slovakia

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

64/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website www.slovensko.sk is the official central portal for public administration services in Slovakia, operated by NASES, a Slovak government agency. It provides a comprehensive range of e-government services and information targeted at Slovak citizens and businesses, covering areas such as housing, transport, finance, culture, defense, family, education, employment, health, and environment. The portal is well-structured and professionally designed, reflecting its role as a key government digital service platform. Technically, the site is built on ASP.NET WebForms with integration of Google Fonts and Google Tag Manager for analytics. While the site uses HTTPS and has basic security practices, explicit security headers and privacy policies are not evident in the provided content, indicating areas for improvement in privacy compliance and security posture. The site is accessible without WAF or blocking mechanisms and does not contain any adult or questionable content, making it safe for general audiences. Overall, the site demonstrates a mature government digital presence with room to enhance privacy transparency and security best practices.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook, YouTube, Google APIs

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching slovensko.sk

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
67
Security headers
65
Email security
60
DNS health
65
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
25
Average
64

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The portal serves as a critical digital gateway for Slovak public services, positioning itself as an essential government platform. Its business model is non-commercial, focused on delivering public administration services efficiently. The extensive catalog of services and links to government agencies indicates a broad partnership ecosystem within the Slovak public sector. The portal's market position is strong as the official e-government hub, supporting digital transformation initiatives in Slovakia. Growth indicators include the presence of a beta version site and continuous service expansions. The portal targets a wide audience including citizens, businesses, and public officials, facilitating access to government services and information. Strategic observations suggest the portal could benefit from enhanced user engagement features and improved privacy and security disclosures to build greater trust.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS usage and some client-side privacy controls such as Google Analytics opt-out cookies. However, the absence of visible security headers like Content Security Policy, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options reduces its defense-in-depth posture. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The lack of published security policies or incident response contacts suggests limited transparency in security governance. Compliance with GDPR is not clearly indicated, and cookie consent mechanisms are missing, which could pose regulatory risks. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a government portal but requires enhancements in security headers, privacy policies, and incident response readiness to meet best practices and regulatory expectations.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with explicit GDPR compliance statements.
  2. Add and enforce security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Enhance mobile responsiveness and accessibility to improve user experience across devices.
  4. Publish a vulnerability disclosure policy and incident response contact information to increase transparency and trust.
  5. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and analytics to minimize privacy risks and ensure compliance.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
NASES
Description
Ústredný portál verejnej správy
Key services
Public administration services, Online forms and service applications
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, Google Fonts, Google Tag Manager, ASP.NET WebForms
Frameworks
ASP.NET
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS usage implied by domain
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of secure cookies for Google Analytics opt-out

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a Slovak government public administration portal.
  2. Content is comprehensive and structured for citizens and businesses.
  3. No privacy or cookie policy pages explicitly found in the provided HTML.
  4. Google Analytics is used with opt-out cookie mechanism.
  5. No explicit security headers detected in HTML content.
  6. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly found in the provided HTML snippet.
  7. Website uses ASP.NET WebForms technology.
  8. No WAF or blocking mechanisms detected.
  9. No adult or questionable content detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a legacy ASP.NET WebForms platform, which may limit modernization and scalability. The use of Google Fonts and Google Tag Manager indicates integration with modern web services, but the overall technology stack is dated. Performance appears moderate with no explicit optimization indicators. The site includes basic mobile viewport settings but lacks advanced responsive design features. SEO is basic with meta description and keywords present but no Open Graph or JSON-LD structured data detected in the provided content. Accessibility features are minimal, with no ARIA roles or landmarks evident. Technical risks include potential challenges in maintaining and upgrading the legacy platform and the need to implement modern security and privacy standards.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 64/100Medium32 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with slovensko.sk. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review slovensko.sk.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.