Skip to main content

Security report for slovanet.net

Slovanet · Telecommunications · Slovakia

Medium risk. 3 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

74/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Slovanet is a Slovak telecommunications company offering high-speed internet, digital television, and telephony services. The website positions Slovanet as a regional ISP with a focus on providing fast and unlimited internet access, a rich selection of TV programs, and affordable telephony. The company targets general consumers and businesses within Slovakia. Technically, the website is built on WordPress and integrates multiple modern analytics and marketing tools such as Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, and Cookiebot for cookie consent management. The site is mobile-optimized and uses HTTPS with a good SSL configuration, indicating a mature digital infrastructure. Security-wise, while HTTPS and cookie consent are implemented, the absence of HTTP security headers and a published privacy policy or terms of service reduces the overall security posture. The lack of WHOIS registration data is a notable concern, suggesting either privacy protection or domain registration issues, which impacts trustworthiness. Overall, the website is professional and functional but would benefit from enhanced transparency and security documentation.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
88/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      SSL Certificate Expires Soon

      SSL certificate expires in 28 days

      What to do: Renew SSL certificate before expiration

      • NIS2 21(2)(h)
      • IR 2024/2690 9.2(c): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 9.2(c): Cryptography
      • NIST SC-17: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-17: Public Key Infrastructure Certificates

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching slovanet.net

This scan found 20 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
52
Security headers
60
Email security
60
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
88
Average
74

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Slovanet operates in the telecommunications sector in Slovakia, providing essential internet, TV, and telephony services. Its business model is service-oriented, targeting residential and business customers seeking reliable connectivity solutions. The company leverages digital marketing and analytics tools to optimize user engagement and advertising effectiveness. The presence of structured data and SEO optimization indicates a focus on digital visibility. However, the missing WHOIS data and lack of explicit contact details may hinder customer trust and regulatory compliance. There is no evidence of partnerships or subsidiaries from the website content. The company appears to be a medium-sized regional player with consistent branding and a clear service offering.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enforced and cookie consent implemented, which aligns with GDPR requirements. The use of reCAPTCHA helps mitigate automated abuse. However, the absence of key HTTP security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), HSTS, and X-Frame-Options reduces protection against common web attacks. No vulnerability disclosure or incident response policies are published, limiting transparency and preparedness for security incidents. The lack of a privacy policy and terms of service on the site is a compliance gap. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. Overall, the security posture is adequate but could be significantly improved by adopting best practices and publishing relevant policies.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service to improve transparency and compliance.
  2. Implement HTTP security headers including CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection.
  3. Add a security.txt file or vulnerability disclosure policy to facilitate responsible reporting of security issues.
  4. Provide clear contact information for security incidents and general inquiries to enhance trust.
  5. Regularly review and audit third-party scripts and analytics tools to minimize security risks.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Slovanet
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Slovanet
Description
Ponuka služieb Slovanetu: Poriadne rýchly a neobmedzený internet, digitálna televízia, bohatá nádielka televíznych programov, lacnejšie telefonovanie.
Key services
Internet, Digital Television, Telephony
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 6.8.2, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, Cookiebot, Crazy Egg, Zopim Live Chat, Google reCAPTCHA, Gutena Tabs
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent banner
  • Use of reCAPTCHA
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Umami Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Ad networks
Google AdWords, Crazy Egg
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, Umami Analytics
Marketing tools
Cookiebot
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is accessible and not blocked by WAF or security challenges.
  2. No WHOIS registration data available, indicating possible domain registration issues or privacy protection.
  3. Website uses modern tracking and analytics tools with cookie consent.
  4. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service found on the homepage HTML.
  5. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found in the provided HTML content.
  6. Good use of structured data (JSON-LD) for SEO and business information.
  7. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure policy detected.
  8. No explicit security or incident response policies found.
  9. Website content is professional and relevant to telecommunications services.
  10. No adult or questionable content detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress 6.8.2, utilizing a variety of modern JavaScript libraries and third-party services including Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, Cookiebot, Crazy Egg, and Zopim live chat. The presence of structured data (JSON-LD) enhances SEO and search engine understanding. The site is mobile responsive with good design quality and navigation clarity. Performance is moderate, likely influenced by multiple external scripts. Accessibility features are basic but present. Hosting provider details are not explicitly found. The technical stack is modern and well-integrated but could benefit from performance optimization and enhanced security configurations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with slovanet.net. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review slovanet.net.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.