Skip to main content

Security report for sliac.sk

Mesto Sliač · Government · Slovakia

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and SSL/TLS.

Security score

66/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Mesto Sliač operates an official municipal website serving residents and visitors with comprehensive information about local governance, public announcements, events, and electronic services. The website is well-positioned as the authoritative source for municipal information in Sliač, Slovakia. It targets local citizens and stakeholders seeking administrative and community updates. The business model is typical for government entities, focusing on transparency and public service delivery. Technically, the website is built on WordPress CMS with a modern tech stack including jQuery, Google Fonts, and various social media integration scripts. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and accessibility features. SEO practices are adequately implemented with proper meta tags and structured data. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS and employs cookie consent mechanisms compliant with GDPR. However, security headers are not explicitly detected, and there is no visible incident response or vulnerability disclosure information. The site does not expose sensitive data and uses standard security plugins, but could improve by adding explicit security policies and enhancing header configurations. Overall, the website presents a low-risk profile with high trustworthiness and no adult or questionable content. Strategic recommendations include implementing security headers, properly configuring analytics, and publishing incident response and vulnerability disclosure policies to strengthen security posture and compliance.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of sliac.sk. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook, Twitter, LinkedIn, YouTube, Google APIs, Google Ads

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching sliac.sk

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
80
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
66

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The website serves as the official digital presence of the municipal government of Sliač, Slovakia. It provides transparency through public announcements, procurement information, and electronic services, indicating a focus on civic engagement and administrative efficiency. The presence of partner domains related to smart city solutions and local services suggests a collaborative ecosystem. The business model is non-commercial, centered on public service. Growth indicators include active event listings and recent updates. The site’s competitive advantage lies in its official status and comprehensive local information. Revenue streams are not applicable as it is a government entity. Target customers are local residents, businesses, and visitors. The partnership ecosystem includes technology providers and local service organizations.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with HTTPS enabled and GDPR-compliant cookie consent mechanisms. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The use of security-related plugins and scripts indicates awareness of privacy and security best practices. However, the absence of security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options represents an area for improvement. Lack of incident response contact information and vulnerability disclosure policies may limit rapid response capabilities. Overall, the site maintains a secure environment appropriate for a government portal but should enhance transparency and technical controls to meet higher security standards.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTP security headers including CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection.
  2. Properly configure Google Analytics or remove unused analytics plugins to avoid data leakage.
  3. Publish explicit security policy and incident response information on the website.
  4. Add a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and plugins for security vulnerabilities and update accordingly.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Mesto Sliač
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Mesto Sliač
Description
Oficiálne stránky mesta Sliač poskytujú informácie o samospráve, mestskom úrade, oznamy mesta a aktuálne podujatia.
Key services
Municipal governance information, Public announcements, Event listings, Electronic services, Contact information
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Google Fonts, MonsterInsights (Google Analytics plugin), Cookie Law Info plugin, Splide.js (carousel), Facebook SDK, Pinterest script, Twitter widgets, LinkedIn script, WP Rocket LazyLoad
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent banner with granular controls
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of security plugins (Cookie Law Info)

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Marketing tools
Pinterest, Facebook SDK, Twitter widgets, LinkedIn script
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Official municipal website for the town of Sliač, Slovakia.
  2. Content is comprehensive and well-structured with clear navigation.
  3. Privacy and cookie policies are present and GDPR compliant.
  4. No terms of service or explicit security policy pages found.
  5. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information available.
  6. Website uses WordPress CMS with common plugins and scripts.
  7. HTTPS is enabled with no visible security issues.
  8. Social media presence includes Facebook, Instagram, and YouTube.
  9. No adult or questionable content detected.
  10. No WAF or blocking mechanisms detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS with a modern and common technology stack including jQuery, Google Fonts, and social media SDKs. It uses Splide.js for carousel functionality and WP Rocket for lazy loading images, enhancing performance. The site is mobile responsive and includes accessibility features such as skip links and ARIA labels. SEO is supported by meta tags, Open Graph tags, and JSON-LD structured data. Performance is moderate, with room for optimization in script loading and caching. Hosting provider details are not explicit. Technical risks are low but could be mitigated by improving security headers and analytics configuration.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 66/100Medium30 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with sliac.sk. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review sliac.sk.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.