Skip to main content

Security report for slant.cz

Slant - Branding collective · Other · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

65/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Slant - Branding collective is a small branding agency based in Brno, Czech Republic, specializing in web design, brand creation, and graphic brand growth. The company emphasizes a thorough analysis of client needs to deliver design solutions that attract and retain the right customers. The website is built on WordPress using the Elementor page builder and integrates multiple analytics and marketing tools including Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, and Matomo. The technical infrastructure is modern and supports good mobile optimization and SEO practices. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enabled and IP anonymization in analytics, but lacks security headers and formal security policies. Privacy compliance is minimal with no visible privacy or cookie policies or consent mechanisms. Business credibility is supported by consistent WHOIS data and professional website content. Overall, the website is functional and professional but would benefit from enhanced privacy and security practices.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching slant.cz

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
85
Security headers
65
Email security
70
DNS health
60
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
65

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Slant positions itself as a specialized branding collective serving clients primarily in the Czech Republic. Its business model focuses on providing comprehensive branding and web design services, leveraging content and design integration as a competitive advantage. The company targets businesses seeking to develop or grow their brand identity. The website content and structured data indicate a small-sized agency founded in 2020, with no parent or subsidiary companies identified. The use of modern web technologies and marketing tools suggests a digitally mature operation. However, the absence of privacy and security policies may impact trust with privacy-conscious clients. The agency appears to maintain a moderate market position with potential for growth through improved compliance and security transparency.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic to moderate security maturity level. HTTPS is properly implemented, and analytics scripts use IP anonymization, which is positive. However, the lack of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options reduces protection against common web attacks. No incident response or security policy information is provided, limiting transparency and preparedness indicators. There are no visible vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data in the analyzed content. Compliance gaps exist due to missing privacy and cookie policies and lack of GDPR compliance indicators. Overall, the security posture is functional but could be significantly improved by adopting standard security headers, publishing security policies, and implementing privacy compliance mechanisms.

Recommendations

  1. Implement standard security headers (Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options) to enhance protection against web attacks.
  2. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with clear consent mechanisms to improve GDPR compliance and user trust.
  3. Establish and publish a security policy and incident response contact information to demonstrate security readiness.
  4. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and plugins to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
  5. Consider adding a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting and improve transparency.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Slant - Branding collective
Description
Specializujeme se na webdesign, tvorbu brandu, grafický růst značky a vynikáme ve spojení obsahu s designem. Práci začínáme důkladnou analýzou klienta a jeho potřeb a naše návrhy tak přitáhnou a udrží ty správné zákazníky.
Key services
webdesign, brand creation, graphic brand growth, content and design integration
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Elementor, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, Matomo Analytics, jQuery
Frameworks
Elementor
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • IP anonymization in Google Analytics

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Matomo
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, Matomo
Marketing tools
Leady
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a professional branding agency based in Brno, Czech Republic.
  2. Uses WordPress CMS with Elementor page builder.
  3. Includes multiple analytics and tracking scripts.
  4. No visible privacy or cookie policies found.
  5. No explicit security policies or incident response contacts.
  6. No security headers detected in provided data.
  7. WHOIS data is consistent and domain age appropriate.
  8. No WAF or blocking mechanisms detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a WordPress CMS platform using the Elementor page builder, which provides a modern and flexible content management environment. The tech stack includes jQuery, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, and Matomo for analytics and marketing. Hosting is provided by REG-WEBGLOBE, a known registrar and hosting provider. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and SEO meta tags present. Accessibility features are basic but present. The site uses structured data (JSON-LD) for organization, website, breadcrumb, author, and article schema, enhancing search engine understanding. There is no evidence of technical debt or deprecated technologies, but the absence of security headers and privacy policies indicates areas for modernization and compliance improvement.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with slant.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review slant.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.