Skip to main content

Security report for skroutz.gr

Other · N/a

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and Security headers.

Security score

74/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website www.skroutz.gr is currently inaccessible due to a Cloudflare security challenge page that blocks access to the actual content. This challenge includes a Turnstile captcha and browser verification, preventing automated access and scraping. As a result, no business, contact, or policy information is available for analysis. The technical infrastructure indicates use of Cloudflare's security and performance services, but no further details on CMS, frameworks, or hosting can be determined. The security posture cannot be evaluated due to the blocking mechanism, and no vulnerabilities or compliance indicators are visible. Overall, the site is protected by a strong WAF, but this limits external analysis. For a full assessment, direct access beyond the WAF is required.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching skroutz.gr

This scan found 15 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
100
Security headers
55
Email security
87
DNS health
90
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
74

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Due to the Cloudflare WAF challenge, no business intelligence data such as company name, market position, business model, or sector information is accessible. No contact details, policies, or certifications are exposed. The domain WHOIS data was not provided for analysis, and thus no conclusions about registration consistency or legitimacy can be drawn. The site appears to be protected by enterprise-grade security measures, indicating a potentially significant business presence, but no explicit data is available.

Security posture

The website employs Cloudflare's security challenge platform, including Turnstile captcha, which is a strong indicator of proactive security measures against bots and automated threats. However, the inability to access the actual site content prevents evaluation of security headers, SSL configuration, or vulnerability exposure. No incident response or security policy information is available. The security posture is therefore indeterminate but likely robust given the use of Cloudflare's advanced protection.

Recommendations

  1. Provide access to a non-blocked version or staging environment for external security and compliance assessments.
  2. Publish clear privacy, cookie, and security policies accessible without WAF challenges to improve transparency.
  3. Implement visible contact and incident response information for security researchers and customers.
  4. Ensure WHOIS data is consistent and publicly available to support legitimacy verification.
  5. Consider adding security.txt and vulnerability disclosure policies to enhance security culture and trust.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Cloudflare detected. Detected Cloudflare security challenge page with Turnstile captcha and browser verification. These observations may be incomplete. For a fuller analysis, contact guard@offseq.com.

Business

Technology

Stack
Cloudflare Turnstile, Cloudflare Challenge Platform, Cloudflare Insights Beacon

Analytics and tracking

Services
Cloudflare Insights
Tracking level
minimal

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Cloudflare Insights

Site quality

Key observations

  1. Website content is blocked by Cloudflare security challenge.
  2. No actual website content accessible for analysis.
  3. No metadata, forms, or business information available.
  4. Only Cloudflare related scripts and challenge UI present.
  5. No contact information or policies found.
  6. Security posture cannot be assessed due to blocking.
  7. Analysis incomplete due to WAF/security mechanisms. For accurate analysis, please contact guard@offseq.com
Technical notes

Notes

The technical setup relies heavily on Cloudflare services for security and performance, including the Turnstile captcha and challenge platform. The site uses modern JavaScript-based challenge mechanisms and Cloudflare Insights for analytics. No CMS or backend technologies are detectable due to the blocking page. Performance and SEO cannot be assessed. The site is mobile responsive in the challenge UI, but actual site responsiveness is unknown. The heavy reliance on Cloudflare indicates a modern infrastructure but also limits external technical analysis.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 71/100Medium24 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with skroutz.gr. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review skroutz.gr.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.