Skip to main content

Security report for sklkommentus.se

Adda AB · Government · Sweden

High risk. 6 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and SSL/TLS.

Security score

49/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Adda AB operates as a specialized service provider supporting the Swedish public sector through framework agreements, procurement support, competence development, and training. The company targets employees within municipalities, regions, and other public organizations, offering both digital and printed resources to facilitate efficient public procurement and workforce development. The website reflects a mature market position with clear service offerings and a professional digital presence. Technically, the website employs modern web technologies including Vue.js, Microsoft Application Insights for telemetry, and Google reCAPTCHA v3 for bot protection. The site is built on the Episerver CMS platform, ensuring structured content management and good SEO practices. Mobile optimization and accessibility are well addressed, contributing to a positive user experience. From a security perspective, the site benefits from HTTPS encryption, cookie consent mechanisms, and monitoring tools. However, explicit security policies, incident response contacts, and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms are absent, representing areas for improvement. No critical vulnerabilities or blocking mechanisms were detected, indicating a solid security posture overall. The overall risk profile is low with recommendations to enhance transparency around security policies and incident handling. Strategic improvements in security headers and vulnerability disclosure would further strengthen trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
0/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • Critical

      No HTTPS encryption

      GDPR requires appropriate security measures for personal data

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate for HTTPS

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS Encryption

      Website does not use HTTPS encryption, making all data transmission vulnerable to interception

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate and redirect all HTTP traffic to HTTPS

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching sklkommentus.se

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
75
Email security
55
DNS health
65
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
0
Average
49

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Adda AB is positioned as a key facilitator for public sector procurement and competence development in Sweden. Its business model focuses on B2G services, leveraging framework agreements and training to support municipalities and regions. The company benefits from a strong brand presence, consistent messaging, and active engagement through social media channels. Revenue streams likely include subscription-based organizational training and sales of printed materials. The partnership ecosystem includes public sector entities and possibly other service providers in welfare and procurement domains. Growth indicators include active event participation and digital service expansion.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with HTTPS enforcement, bot mitigation via reCAPTCHA, and telemetry monitoring through Application Insights. Cookie consent is implemented with user choice options, supporting GDPR compliance. However, the absence of a published security policy, incident response contacts, and vulnerability disclosure reduces transparency and preparedness perception. Security headers could be more explicitly defined to enhance protection against common web threats. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected. Overall, the security culture appears proactive but could benefit from formalized documentation and communication.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a dedicated security policy page outlining security practices and compliance.
  2. Add incident response contact information, such as security@ or abuse@ email addresses.
  3. Implement and publish a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file.
  4. Enhance HTTP security headers including Strict-Transport-Security, X-Content-Type-Options, and X-Frame-Options.
  5. Regularly audit and update third-party libraries and scripts to mitigate vulnerabilities.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Adda AB
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Adda AB
Description
Vi erbjuder ramavtal, upphandlingsstöd, kompetensutveckling, utbildningar, tryckta blanketter och böcker för medarbetare inom offentlig sektor.
Key services
Ramavtal (framework agreements), Upphandlingsstöd (procurement support), Kompetensutveckling (competence development), Utbildningar (training courses), Tryckta blanketter och böcker (printed forms and books)
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, Google reCAPTCHA v3, Microsoft Application Insights, Google Fonts, SVG icons
Frameworks
Vue.js (indicated by data-v-app attribute), Azure Application Insights SDK
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of HTTPS
  • Use of Google reCAPTCHA v3 for bot protection
  • Application Insights for monitoring
  • Cookie consent with options for necessary and statistical cookies

Analytics and tracking

Services
Microsoft Application Insights
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
LinkedIn Ads
Tracking pixels
LinkedIn Insight Tag
Marketing tools
Microsoft Application Insights, Google reCAPTCHA
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is professionally presented in Swedish targeting public sector employees.
  3. Clear cookie consent mechanism with options for necessary and statistical cookies.
  4. No explicit terms of service found on homepage or footer.
  5. Contact information is prominently displayed in footer with phone, email, and physical address.
  6. Use of modern web technologies and analytics tools.
  7. Social media presence on LinkedIn, Instagram, and YouTube.
  8. No visible security policy or incident response contact information.
  9. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern CMS platform (Episerver) with a frontend framework likely Vue.js, enabling dynamic and responsive user interfaces. Integration with Microsoft Application Insights provides robust telemetry and performance monitoring. Google reCAPTCHA v3 is used for spam and bot protection. The site loads fonts from Google Fonts and uses SVG icons for scalable graphics. Performance is moderate with asynchronous script loading and deferred JavaScript. Accessibility considerations are evident in ARIA attributes and keyboard navigation support. SEO is supported by comprehensive meta tags and Open Graph data. Technical risks are minimal but could be reduced further by tightening security headers and ensuring all external resources use Subresource Integrity.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with sklkommentus.se. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review sklkommentus.se.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.