Skip to main content

Security report for skiroviegli.lv

Valsts vides dienests · Government · Latvia

Medium risk. 10 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 2 other checks.

Security score

52/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website skiroviegli.lv is an official Latvian government environmental service platform managed by Valsts vides dienests. It provides comprehensive information about public waste sorting and collection points across Latvia, promoting sustainable waste management practices to residents and municipalities. The platform integrates interactive maps and multilingual support to enhance user accessibility and engagement. The website is well-branded with government and EU project logos, reinforcing its official status. Technically, the site employs modern JavaScript libraries such as jQuery, Bootstrap, and Leaflet for interactive mapping, alongside Google Translate and Google Tag Manager for multilingual support and analytics. The site is mobile-optimized and structured for good user experience, although accessibility compliance is only partial. No CMS or hosting provider details are evident from the content. From a security perspective, the site uses HTTPS and avoids exposing sensitive data. However, no explicit security headers were detected, and there is a lack of privacy and cookie policies, which are important for GDPR compliance. No forms collecting personal data were found, reducing immediate privacy risks. The WHOIS data confirms the domain is registered to the Latvian State Environmental Service, supporting legitimacy, though some WHOIS details like registrar and creation date are missing. Overall, the website is a credible, government-backed platform with good content quality and technical implementation. To enhance security and compliance, it should implement security headers, publish privacy and cookie policies, and improve accessibility. These steps will strengthen user trust and regulatory adherence.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching skiroviegli.lv

This scan found 29 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
67
Security headers
15
Email security
60
DNS health
60
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
52

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Skiroviegli.lv operates as a government service platform under Valsts vides dienests, targeting Latvian residents and local municipalities to facilitate waste sorting and environmental sustainability. Its market position is that of an authoritative public service provider with no direct commercial competition. The business model focuses on information dissemination and public engagement rather than revenue generation. Partnerships with various government and EU entities are evident through linked domains and logos. The platform supports growth in public environmental awareness and compliance with national waste management regulations. Its strategic advantage lies in official backing and comprehensive geographic coverage of waste sorting points.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security posture with HTTPS enabled and no visible sensitive data leaks. However, the absence of security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options represents a gap in defense-in-depth. The lack of published security policies, incident response contacts, or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms limits transparency and preparedness. Privacy compliance is partial due to missing privacy and cookie policies. The use of Google Tag Manager introduces moderate user tracking, which should be balanced with clear privacy disclosures. Overall, the security maturity is adequate for a public information site but requires enhancements to meet best practices and regulatory standards.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including CSP, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Publish detailed privacy and cookie policies to improve GDPR compliance and user transparency.
  3. Enhance website accessibility to fully comply with relevant standards and improve user inclusivity.
  4. Establish and publicize an incident response plan and vulnerability disclosure policy to build trust and readiness.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and tracking tools to minimize privacy risks and optimize performance.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Valsts vides dienests
Registration number
90000017078
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Valsts vides dienests
Description
The website promotes and provides information about public waste sorting and collection points in Latvia, encouraging citizens to sort waste easily and responsibly.
Key services
Information on public waste sorting points, Waste sorting education and awareness, Operator information and updates
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Bootstrap, Leaflet, Google Translate, Google Tag Manager
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS usage implied by URL
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Marketing tools
Google Translate
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no WAF or blocking detected.
  2. Content is focused on public environmental service for waste sorting in Latvia.
  3. No privacy or cookie policy pages found, which is a compliance gap.
  4. Contact information is clearly provided with official government email and phone.
  5. Use of modern JavaScript libraries and map integration (Leaflet) for interactive features.
  6. No forms collecting personal data detected in the HTML content.
  7. No explicit security headers detected in the provided data.
  8. Google Tag Manager is used for analytics and tracking.
  9. No signs of suspicious or malicious content.
  10. Website content is in Latvian with Google Translate integration for multilingual support.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern front-end technology stack with jQuery, Bootstrap for responsive design, and Leaflet for interactive mapping. Google Translate integration supports multilingual access, and Google Tag Manager enables analytics and tracking. The site structure is clean with semantic HTML and organized sections. Performance is moderate, with potential improvements in loading speed and optimization. No CMS or backend platform is identified, suggesting a custom or static site approach. Accessibility is addressed but only partially compliant. The lack of security headers and privacy policies indicates technical debt in security and compliance areas. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports the business goals but can benefit from modernization and enhanced security controls.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 50/100Medium36 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with skiroviegli.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review skiroviegli.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.