Skip to main content

Security report for skinexpert.lv

Other

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 2 other checks.

Security score

59/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The domain skinexpert.lv currently hosts only a placeholder page indicating that the domain has been assigned but no active website content is published. The page is served via the Tilda platform and contains no business information, contact details, or privacy and security policies. Due to the lack of WHOIS data (query limit exceeded) and minimal website content, it is not possible to ascertain the legitimacy or operational status of the business behind this domain. The absence of HTTPS information, security headers, and any form of data collection or analytics further indicates that the site is inactive or under development. From a technical perspective, the website is minimal with no detectable CMS, frameworks, or technologies beyond basic HTML. The hosting provider is identified as Tilda, a website building platform. Performance and mobile optimization cannot be fully assessed but are likely basic given the placeholder nature of the site. Security posture is very weak due to the absence of HTTPS confirmation, security headers, and privacy compliance mechanisms. No contact or incident response information is available, and no vulnerability disclosure or security.txt files are present. The domain's WHOIS information is unavailable, limiting trust and legitimacy assessment. Overall, the domain appears inactive or unconfigured for business use. The risk is low in terms of content safety but high in terms of trust and credibility. Strategic recommendations include activating the website with proper business content, implementing HTTPS and security best practices, publishing privacy and cookie policies, and providing clear contact information to improve trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
15/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching skinexpert.lv

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
30
Email security
60
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
15
Average
59

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Due to the lack of active website content and absence of WHOIS data, no meaningful business intelligence can be derived. The domain is registered but not operational. No market positioning, business model, or target audience information is available. No partnerships or subsidiaries are indicated. The domain appears to be reserved or awaiting development.

Security posture

The security posture is minimal to non-existent. No HTTPS or SSL information is available, no security headers are detected, and no privacy or cookie policies are published. There is no evidence of vulnerability disclosure or incident response readiness. The lack of contact information and security frameworks indicates a very low security maturity level. This exposes the domain to potential risks if activated without proper security controls.

Recommendations

  1. Activate the website with meaningful business content and clear branding.
  2. Implement HTTPS with a valid SSL certificate to secure communications.
  3. Add standard security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  4. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with GDPR compliance.
  5. Provide clear contact information including business address, phone, and email.
  6. Establish vulnerability disclosure and incident response procedures.
  7. Monitor WHOIS data and ensure domain registration details are accurate and transparent.
  8. Integrate analytics and performance monitoring tools to improve technical insights.
  9. Enhance mobile optimization and accessibility features for better user experience.
  10. Build trust indicators such as certifications, testimonials, or security badges.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
The website currently displays a placeholder page indicating the domain has been assigned but no active content is published.
Content quality
poor
Branding
inconsistent

Technology

Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
poor

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
poor
User experience
poor
Content relevance
poor
Navigation
poor
Professionalism
poor
Trustworthiness
low

Key observations

  1. Website is a placeholder page hosted on Tilda platform
  2. No active business content or contact information present
  3. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found
  4. No security headers or HTTPS information available
  5. No WHOIS data available due to query limit exceeded
  6. No analytics or tracking scripts detected
  7. No forms or data collection mechanisms present
  8. No social media or external business links except Tilda references
Technical notes

Notes

The website is a simple static placeholder hosted on the Tilda platform with no detectable CMS or advanced frameworks. No scripts, analytics, or tracking technologies are present. The HTML content is minimal and lacks meta tags beyond a robots noindex directive. No forms or interactive elements exist. The site does not appear to be optimized for SEO or accessibility. Hosting is via Tilda, which provides basic infrastructure but no custom technical stack is evident. Performance is likely moderate due to minimal content but cannot be fully assessed. The lack of HTTPS confirmation is a critical technical gap.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with skinexpert.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review skinexpert.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.