Skip to main content

Security report for sjanpawel2.pl

Sanktuarium św. Jana Pawła II Wielkiego w Krakowie · Government · Poland

High risk. 13 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 3 other checks.

Security score

33/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website represents the Sanctuary of Saint John Paul II in Kraków, Poland, serving as a spiritual and cultural hub for pilgrims and visitors. It provides comprehensive information about the sanctuary's history, religious services, chapels, relics, and community events. The site targets religious visitors and the local community, positioning itself as an important non-profit religious institution with a medium-sized digital presence. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with a modern tech stack including WooCommerce and various JavaScript libraries, hosted by a reputable Polish registrar. The website is well-structured, mobile-optimized, and includes privacy and cookie policies with consent mechanisms, reflecting good digital maturity. Security posture is solid with HTTPS and some security best practices, though improvements like DNSSEC and enhanced security headers are recommended. Overall, the site is trustworthy, professional, and compliant with GDPR, with moderate user tracking via Google Analytics. No critical security issues or adult content were detected, making it safe for general audiences.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

13 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  3. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: MySQL

      Port 3306 (MySQL) is publicly accessible - MySQL - Database server

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to MySQL using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

  4. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching sjanpawel2.pl

This scan found 30 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
42
Security headers
15
Email security
40
DNS health
75
Network security
0
GDPR outside view
25
Average
33

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet · found on this site
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The sanctuary operates in the government and non-profit religious sector, focusing on pilgrimage and spiritual services. Its business model revolves around community engagement, religious ceremonies, and donations. The website supports this by providing detailed visitor information, event announcements, and donation regulations. The presence of partner domains related to affiliated sites indicates a networked ecosystem. The sanctuary's market position is strong within its niche, leveraging cultural heritage and religious significance. The site’s content and navigation support user engagement and trust, with clear branding and consistent messaging. Growth potential lies in expanding digital outreach and enhancing online donation capabilities.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a good security baseline with HTTPS enforced and use of security plugins like honeypot for form protection. However, DNSSEC is not enabled, which could expose DNS to spoofing attacks. The absence of explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options reduces defense-in-depth. No vulnerability disclosure or incident response information is provided, which could hinder transparency in case of security incidents. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected. Overall, the security posture is adequate for the site's purpose but could be strengthened by implementing recommended best practices and regular security audits.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC to secure DNS queries and prevent spoofing.
  2. Implement a security.txt file to provide clear vulnerability disclosure and incident response contacts.
  3. Add and configure security headers like Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  4. Maintain up-to-date WordPress core and plugins to mitigate known vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance transparency by publishing security policies and incident response procedures.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Sanktuarium św. Jana Pawła II Wielkiego w Krakowie
Description
A religious sanctuary dedicated to Saint John Paul II located in Kraków, Poland, offering a place for pilgrims worldwide to pray and find spiritual peace. The site includes detailed information about the sanctuary's history, chapels, relics, mass schedules, and community activities.
Key services
Religious services and masses, Pilgrimage site information, Visitor guidance and event announcements, Donation and support facilitation
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, PHP, jQuery, Revolution Slider, WooCommerce, Google Fonts, Font Awesome, DataTables, Google Analytics
Frameworks
WordPress, WooCommerce
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of security plugins (honeypot plugin detected)

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a well-maintained religious sanctuary site with comprehensive content.
  2. Uses WordPress CMS with common plugins and modern frontend libraries.
  3. Has clear privacy and cookie policies with consent mechanisms.
  4. No signs of malicious or suspicious activity detected.
  5. Social media presence is consistent with the organization's mission.
  6. Security posture is good but can be improved with DNSSEC and security headers.
  7. No contact emails explicitly found in HTML; contact likely via forms and contact page.
  8. No visible phone numbers or emails in the provided HTML snippet.
  9. No security.txt or incident response info found.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a WordPress CMS with popular plugins such as WooCommerce, Revolution Slider, and DataTables, supported by jQuery and Font Awesome. Hosting is provided by cyber_Folks S.A., a known Polish registrar and hosting provider. The site is mobile-optimized and includes accessibility features like an accessibility toolbar. Performance is moderate, with some reliance on external CDNs for fonts and scripts. SEO is supported by proper meta tags and structured navigation. Technical debt appears low, but the site could benefit from modern security headers and DNSSEC. Overall, the technical infrastructure is stable and suitable for the sanctuary's digital needs.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with sjanpawel2.pl. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review sjanpawel2.pl.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.