Skip to main content

Security report for sitserv.se

Websupport · Technology · Sweden

High risk. 11 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, SSL/TLS and 2 other checks.

Security score

36/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website sitserv.se currently serves as a parking page hosted by Websupport, one of Europe's largest providers of web hosting and domain registration services. The page contains minimal content, primarily directing visitors to Websupport's main sites and offering a domain search form. The business focus is on providing web hosting and domain registration services, targeting individuals and businesses seeking these services in Sweden and Europe. The website's technical infrastructure relies on Websupport's CDN and standard web technologies such as HTML5, CSS3, and JavaScript. Mobile optimization is adequate, but overall content quality is basic due to the placeholder nature of the site. Security posture is moderate with no HTTPS or security headers explicitly visible in the HTML content, and no privacy or cookie policies are present, indicating compliance gaps. No contact information or incident response channels are provided, limiting trust and transparency. Overall, the site is functional as a parking page but lacks comprehensive business and security information.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
0/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

11 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • Critical

      No HTTPS encryption

      GDPR requires appropriate security measures for personal data

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate for HTTPS

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS Encryption

      Website does not use HTTPS encryption, making all data transmission vulnerable to interception

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate and redirect all HTTP traffic to HTTPS

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching sitserv.se

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
30
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
0
Average
36

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention sitserv.se, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for sitserv.se right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Websupport positions itself as a major player in the European web hosting and domain registration market, leveraging a large customer base and extensive infrastructure. The business model centers on providing domain registration and hosting services, with revenue likely generated from domain sales and hosting subscriptions. The target audience includes both individual users and businesses requiring web presence solutions. The website content is minimal, reflecting a parked domain rather than an active business site, which limits direct insights into operational scale or growth. The presence of multiple related domains under the websupport.se domain suggests a consolidated brand ecosystem. No direct partnerships or subsidiaries are indicated on this page.

Security posture

The security maturity of the website is basic. There is no visible HTTPS enforcement or security headers in the HTML content, which are critical for protecting user data and preventing common web attacks. The absence of privacy and cookie policies indicates non-compliance with GDPR and related regulations. No incident response or security contact information is provided, which is a gap in security governance. The site does not expose sensitive data or use vulnerable libraries, which is positive. Overall, the security posture is minimal and should be improved to meet modern standards, especially if the domain is to be actively used for business purposes.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTPS with a valid SSL/TLS certificate and enforce secure connections site-wide.
  2. Add comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to comply with GDPR and inform users about data handling.
  3. Include clear contact information and dedicated security incident response contacts (e.g., security@ or abuse@ emails).
  4. Deploy security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection to enhance protection.
  5. Enhance website content beyond a parking page to improve trust, user experience, and business credibility.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Websupport
Description
Websupport is one of Europe's largest providers of web hosting and domain names.
Key services
Web hosting, Domain registration
Content quality
basic
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
HTML5, CSS3, JavaScript
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
50/100
Good practices seen
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • No vulnerable libraries detected

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a placeholder/parking page indicating no active content on the domain.
  2. Content is minimal and primarily directs users to Websupport services.
  3. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the page.
  4. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly provided.
  5. No social media links detected.
  6. Form present for domain search with no visible tracking or analytics scripts.
  7. No security headers or advanced security features detected in HTML content.
  8. Website uses Websupport CDN and fonts hosted on websupport.sk domains.
  9. Language toggle between Swedish and English is implemented via JavaScript.
  10. No signs of WAF or security blocking mechanisms.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses standard web technologies including HTML5, CSS3, and JavaScript, with fonts and assets served via Websupport's CDN infrastructure. The site is responsive and adapts well to mobile devices. However, there is no evidence of a CMS or advanced frameworks. Performance is moderate given the minimal content. The domain search form is simple and does not appear to collect excessive user data. No analytics or tracking scripts are detected, indicating minimal data collection. The site lacks advanced SEO optimizations and accessibility features beyond basic placeholders. Technical debt is low due to the simple nature of the site, but modernization opportunities exist if the domain is to be developed further.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with sitserv.se. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review sitserv.se.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.