Skip to main content

Security report for sitemn.gr

SiteManager · Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 2 critical or high findings in SSL/TLS and Security headers.

Security score

68/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

SiteManager is a technology company offering a no-code/low-code collaborative web design platform targeted primarily at agencies, marketing teams, and web professionals. The platform enables users to build, launch, and manage websites with a focus on collaboration among designers, developers, content creators, project managers, and web3 creators. The company positions itself as a leading cloud web design platform trusted by over 250 agencies and powering more than 2500 SME websites. Technically, the website employs modern JavaScript libraries, HubSpot marketing and analytics tools, Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, and other tracking technologies, indicating a mature digital infrastructure. The site is well-optimized for mobile and SEO, with excellent design quality and user experience. Security-wise, the site enforces HTTPS and implements cookie consent mechanisms but lacks explicit security headers and a published security policy or incident response contact. WHOIS data is unavailable due to privacy protection or query failure, but the website's professionalism and trust signals suggest legitimacy. Overall, SiteManager demonstrates a strong market presence with a robust technical and marketing setup, though it could improve transparency around security policies and incident response.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

2 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      Unable to retrieve SSL certificate

      Could not establish secure connection to retrieve certificate information

      What to do: Check if the server is accessible and SSL/TLS is properly configured

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching sitemn.gr

This scan found 13 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
85
Email security
55
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
83
Average
68

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

SiteManager operates in the SaaS technology sector, focusing on no-code web design solutions for agencies and marketing professionals. Its competitive advantage lies in its collaborative platform that integrates design, content management, development, and project management tools. The business model is subscription-based SaaS with additional professional services via SiteManager Studio. The company targets SMEs and agencies seeking efficient, scalable web design solutions. Growth indicators include a broad client base, active community engagement, and continuous product updates. The partnership ecosystem includes integrations with numerous third-party apps and active social media channels. Strategic observations highlight a focus on user empowerment, ease of use, and innovation in no-code web design.

Security posture

The website exhibits a good security maturity level with enforced HTTPS and cookie consent mechanisms aligned with GDPR. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. However, the absence of security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), HSTS, and X-Frame-Options reduces the overall security posture. There is no publicly available security policy or incident response contact, which could hinder timely vulnerability reporting and incident management. Compliance with GDPR is evident through privacy and cookie policies. The security culture appears focused on user privacy and data protection but could benefit from enhanced transparency and formalized security disclosures.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and verify HTTP security headers including CSP, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options to strengthen protection against common web attacks.
  2. Publish a dedicated security policy page outlining security practices, compliance, and incident response procedures.
  3. Establish and publicize a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to improve compliance with WCAG standards and broaden user inclusivity.
  5. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and tracking technologies to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
SiteManager
Description
Empowering agencies and marketing teams to create, launch and manage website experiences no code / low code.
Key services
No-code/low-code website building, Collaborative web design, Content management system, Project management tools, Integrations with multiple apps, Multilingual website support, User management and authentication
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, HubSpot scripts, Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, Leadinfo, Hotjar, LinkedIn Insight Tag, Google Tag Manager, Vanilla LazyLoad
Platforms
SiteManager proprietary platform
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, HubSpot Analytics, Hotjar, Leadinfo, LinkedIn Insight Tag
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Facebook Ads
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, HubSpot Analytics, Hotjar, LinkedIn Insight Tag, Leadinfo
Marketing tools
HubSpot
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and professional design.
  2. No WHOIS data available due to privacy or malformed query.
  3. Strong presence of privacy and cookie policies with consent mechanisms.
  4. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found; contact via forms and support portal.
  5. Multiple social media channels actively linked.
  6. Use of modern tracking and marketing technologies with good privacy compliance.
  7. No security.txt or explicit security policy found.
  8. No visible vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data in HTML.
  9. Website targets agencies and professionals in web design and marketing.
  10. Comprehensive resources and community engagement evident.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern technology stack utilizing JavaScript, HubSpot marketing and analytics tools, Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, and other third-party integrations. It uses a proprietary CMS platform (SiteManager CMS) optimized for no-code/low-code web design. Performance is fast with good mobile optimization and SEO practices. The site structure is clear and navigable, with comprehensive metadata and Open Graph tags for social sharing. There is no evidence of technical debt or legacy technologies. Opportunities exist to improve security headers and formalize security disclosures. The technical risks are minimal but should be monitored continuously given the reliance on multiple third-party scripts.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with sitemn.gr. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review sitemn.gr.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.