Skip to main content

Security report for simplea.com

Simple [A] · Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

70/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Simple [A] is a well-established technology service provider specializing in software development, CMS implementation, mobile app development, and quality assurance services. With a domain age of over 24 years and a professional online presence, the company targets businesses seeking to modernize and optimize their digital content and platforms. Their market position is supported by partnerships with leading CMS platforms such as Kentico, Sitecore, and Umbraco, and a portfolio that includes strategic consulting and support services. Technically, the website leverages a modern JavaScript stack including jQuery, Swiper, LightGallery, and others, hosted on Microsoft Azure DNS infrastructure. The CMS appears to be Kentico Xperience, indicating a mature digital infrastructure. The site is mobile optimized with good SEO and accessibility basics, though some accessibility features could be improved. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS and uses Google reCAPTCHA for form protection. However, it lacks visible security headers and explicit security or incident response policies. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected. Privacy compliance is partial, with a privacy policy present but no cookie consent mechanism despite tracking scripts. Overall, the website presents a low risk profile with strong business credibility and technical implementation. Strategic improvements in privacy compliance and security headers would enhance trust and compliance posture.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
58/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching simplea.com

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
82
Security headers
25
Email security
85
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
58
Average
70

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Simple [A] operates in the technology sector, focusing on delivering custom software and digital content solutions. Their business model centers on service provision to enterprises and organizations needing CMS migration, app development, and QA services. The company demonstrates competitive advantages through long-term domain ownership, partnerships with major CMS vendors, and a diverse service portfolio. Target customers include medium to large businesses seeking digital transformation. Growth indicators include recent articles and case studies showcasing successful projects. The partnership ecosystem is robust, featuring recognized technology providers. Operationally, the company maintains a professional web presence with clear contact channels and marketing tools.

Security posture

The security maturity of Simple [A] is moderate to good. HTTPS is enforced, and Google reCAPTCHA is implemented to protect forms from abuse. However, the absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options reduces defense-in-depth. No public security or incident response policies limit transparency and preparedness perception. Privacy compliance is partial; a privacy policy exists but lacks cookie consent mechanisms. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were found in the analysis. Incident response readiness and data protection officer contact information are not publicly disclosed, indicating room for improvement in governance and compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Implement a cookie consent banner to comply with GDPR and enhance user privacy transparency.
  2. Add security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and X-Frame-Options to strengthen security posture.
  3. Publish a clear security policy and incident response plan accessible to users and partners.
  4. Regularly audit and update third-party libraries to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
  5. Consider appointing and publicly listing a Data Protection Officer or privacy contact to improve compliance and trust.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Simple [A]
Description
Simple [A] empowers businesses with cutting-edge software solutions, specializing in custom development, CMS implementation, mobile app creation, and quality assurance services. Their mission is to unite teams, streamline workflows, and transform customer experiences through innovative technology.
Key services
Software Development, App Development, Support & Maintenance, Software QA & Testing, CMS Implementation (Kentico, Sitecore, Umbraco), Strategic Consulting
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery 3.5.1, Bootstrap (implied by classes and offcanvas usage), Swiper.js, LightGallery, Lottie Player, Rellax.js, Jarallax, Just Validate, Showdown, Select2
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of Google reCAPTCHA v3 invisible
  • Client-side form validation
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Google reCAPTCHA
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed with clear navigation and good content structure.
  2. No explicit cookie consent mechanism found despite use of tracking scripts.
  3. Contact information is clearly provided including phone and email.
  4. Use of modern JavaScript libraries and CMS platform Kentico Xperience.
  5. No visible security policy or incident response information publicly available.
  6. WHOIS data supports legitimacy and long-term operation of the domain.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a mature CMS platform (Kentico Xperience) and uses a modern front-end technology stack including jQuery, Swiper, and LightGallery. Hosting is via Microsoft Azure DNS, indicating reliable infrastructure. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and SEO practices. Accessibility is basic but could be enhanced. The site uses Google Analytics and Tag Manager for analytics and tracking, but lacks a cookie consent mechanism. Technical debt appears low, but improvements in security headers and privacy compliance are recommended to reduce risk and improve user trust.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with simplea.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review simplea.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.