Skip to main content

Security report for simplanova.com

Simplanova · Technology · N/a

Low risk. 3 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

76/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Simplanova is a specialized Microsoft ISV Development Center focusing on Microsoft Dynamics NAV and Dynamics 365 Business Central development and upgrade services. The company offers a range of services including ERP upgrades, migrations, add-on upgrades, and CRM development, targeting businesses using Microsoft Dynamics products. The website reflects a professional service provider with a clear niche in Microsoft ERP modernization. Technically, the website is built on WordPress and integrates multiple modern marketing and analytics tools such as HubSpot, LinkedIn Insight, Hotjar, and Cookiebot for cookie consent management. The site is hosted behind Cloudflare, ensuring good performance and security at the network level. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enabled and cookie consent implemented; however, the absence of DNSSEC and security headers indicates room for improvement. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service pages were found, which is a compliance gap. Contact information is not explicitly visible, which may affect user trust and business credibility. Overall, the domain registration data supports the legitimacy of the business with a long-standing domain and consistent registration details.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching simplanova.com

This scan found 19 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
30
Email security
80
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
83
Average
76

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Simplanova positions itself as a niche service provider in the Microsoft Dynamics ERP ecosystem, leveraging its status as an official Microsoft ISV Development Center to build trust. The business model revolves around providing specialized development and upgrade services to enterprises using Dynamics NAV and Business Central. The company targets medium-sized businesses requiring ERP modernization and migration services. The website's integration with marketing and analytics platforms indicates an active digital marketing strategy. The lack of visible contact details and privacy policy may limit conversion and trust. The domain age and registration details align with a mature business, suggesting stability and experience in the market.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enforced and cookie consent managed via Cookiebot, indicating GDPR awareness. However, the absence of DNSSEC and security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS), and X-Frame-Options reduces the overall security posture. No security policy or incident response contacts are published, which is a gap in transparency and readiness. The use of multiple third-party analytics and marketing scripts increases the attack surface and privacy risks. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. Overall, the security posture is adequate but could be significantly improved by implementing recommended headers, publishing security policies, and enhancing privacy compliance documentation.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to enhance DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Implement and configure security headers such as CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy page detailing data collection, processing, and GDPR compliance.
  4. Add explicit contact information including company emails and phone numbers to improve trust and compliance.
  5. Create and publish a security policy and incident response contact details to demonstrate security readiness.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Simplanova
Description
Official Microsoft ISV Development Center, specializing in Microsoft Dynamics NAV / 365 Business Central Development & Upgrades.
Key services
Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central Upgrade, Clean-Start Dynamics NAV Upgrade, Microsoft Dynamics GP Migration to Dynamics 365 Business Central, Add-on Upgrade to Extensions, Microsoft Dynamics NAV / 365 Business Central Development, Dynamics AX / FSCM Development, Dynamics 365 Customer Engagement (CRM) Development, Extended Microsoft Dynamics 365 Team
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, jQuery, Slick Carousel, PrettyDropdowns, Cookiebot, HubSpot, LinkedIn Insight, Hotjar
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Cookie consent implemented via Cookiebot
  • No exposed sensitive data detected in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
HubSpot Analytics, Hotjar, LinkedIn Insight
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Ad networks
Meta Platforms, Inc., Google
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, LinkedIn Insight, HubSpot tracking, Hotjar
Marketing tools
HubSpot, MailerLite
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website uses HTTPS with valid SSL.
  2. Cookie consent implemented with Cookiebot, showing GDPR awareness.
  3. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service found on main page or navigation.
  4. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly found in visible content or metadata.
  5. Multiple marketing and analytics scripts loaded, indicating extensive user tracking.
  6. Website built on WordPress with common plugins and libraries.
  7. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure page detected.
  8. No explicit security policy or incident response information available.
  9. WHOIS data shows domain is stable and not privacy protected.
  10. No WAF or blocking mechanisms detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS with common plugins and libraries including jQuery, Slick Carousel, and PrettyDropdowns. It uses Cloudflare for DNS and CDN services, which provides performance and security benefits. The site integrates multiple marketing and analytics tools such as HubSpot, LinkedIn Insight, Hotjar, and MailerLite, indicating a mature digital marketing infrastructure. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and basic accessibility features. SEO is supported by proper meta tags, Open Graph tags, and JSON-LD structured data. The technical stack is modern but could benefit from enhanced security configurations and performance optimizations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with simplanova.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review simplanova.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.